Re: [DISCUSS] PMC/Committer Emiratus status

ote: > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 7, 2023, at 3:34 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >> >>  >> >>> On Mar 7, 2023, at 6:36 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: >>> >>> Websites tend to quickly become obsolete about this kind of thing, >>

Re: [DISCUSS] PMC/Committer Emiratus status

> On Mar 7, 2023, at 6:36 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Websites tend to quickly become obsolete about this kind of thing, > because really > nobody takes care of its own "status" on a project, or that it is > "visible" on the website. > It is not for the benefit of anyone. I would beg to dif

Re: [DISCUSS] PMC/Committer Emiratus status

I would proceed carefully with this, and would recommend against removing PMC members who are “inactive”. Rather, I would recommend a project-level “active/inactive” flag that PMC members can voluntarily apply to themselves. For example, do a PMC roll call on private@pulsar.a.o

Re: [DRAFT] November report

+1 -Taylor > On Nov 14, 2018, at 2:36 PM, Matteo Merli wrote: > > Please take a look > > - > > ## Description: > > Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on > commodity hardware. It provides simple pub-sub semantics over topics, > guaranteed at-least-once del