+1 (binding)
- Verified the checksums and signatures
- Built sources with JDK21
- Ran tests using the provided docker image and client (from the
staging repo) in a private application
- Deployed on k3s 1.30 using KAAP operator and ran simple produce/consume tests
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 20
+1 (binding)
- Verified the checksums and signatures
- Built sources with JDK17
- Ran tests using the provided docker image and client (from the
staging repo) in a private application
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 14 gen 2025 alle ore 04:50 guo jiwei
ha scritto:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
&
+1 (binding)
- Verified the checksums and signatures
- Ran simple test to validate the staging repo on jdk21
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno gio 12 dic 2024 alle ore 22:22 Lari Hotari
ha scritto:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Validated source artifacts
> - checked sha512 checksum
> -
+1 (binding)
- Verified the checksums and signatures
- Installed the chart on K3s 1.30 with Helm v3.16.1 on arm64 machine (apple m3)
- Ran basic client performance tests
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 9 dic 2024 alle ore 09:21 David Jensen
ha scritto:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> # veri
+1 (binding)
- Verified the checksums and signatures
- Built sources with JDK17
- Ran tests using the provided docker image and client (from the
staging repo) in a private application
- Deployed on k3s 1.30 using KAAP operator and ran simple produce/consume tests
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 2
+1 (binding)
- Verified the checksums and signatures
- Built sources with JDK17
- Ran tests using the provided docker image and client (from the
staging repo) in a private application
- Deployed on k3s 1.30 using KAAP operator and ran simple produce/consume tests
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 2
+1 (binding)
- Verified the checksums and signatures
- Built sources with JDK17
- Ran tests using the provided docker image and client (from the
staging repo) in a private application
- Deployed on k3s 1.30 using KAAP operator and ran simple produce/consume tests
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 2
+1 (binding)
- Verified the checksums and signatures
- Ran simple test to validate the staging repo on jdk21 (against Pulsar 3.3.2)
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 13 nov 2024 alle ore 18:11 Chris Bono
ha scritto:
>
> Following PIP-205: Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar (
> https://g
milestone, Lari.
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno gio 17 ott 2024 alle ore 18:34 Zixuan Liu
ha scritto:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Verified checksum and signature
> - Built from source
> - Ran standalone with produce and consume by bin package
> - Ran standalone with produce and consume
+1 (binding)
- Verified the checksums and signatures
- Ran simple test to validate the staging repo on jdk21
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 16 ott 2024 alle ore 19:39 Lari Hotari
ha scritto:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Validated source artifacts
> - checked sha512 checksum
> -
+1 (binding)
- Verified the checksums and signatures
- Installed the chart on K3s 1.30 with Helm v3.16.1 on arm64 machine (apple m3)
- Ran basic client performance tests
- Verified default Pulsar image to be 3.0.7
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno ven 11 ott 2024 alle ore 09:42 David Jensen
ha
+1
Thanks
Il gio 3 ott 2024, 02:36 Apurva Telang ha
scritto:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best regards,
> Apurva Telang.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 00:32 Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il Mer 2 Ott 2024, 03:21 Matteo Merli ha
> scritto:
> >
> > > +1
> > > --
+1 binding
Thanks
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno ven 20 set 2024 alle ore 10:16 guo jiwei
ha scritto:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 9:43 PM Lari Hotari wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > -Lari
>
+1 binding
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 29 lug 2024 alle ore 15:04 guo jiwei
ha scritto:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 1:41 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Than
+1 binding
Verified checksum and default Pulsar image to be 3.0.5
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 4 giu 2024 alle ore 13:56 Lari Hotari
ha scritto:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Lari
>
> On 2024/05/17 15:00:16 Lari Hotari wrote:
> > Hello Apache Pulsar Community,
> >
>
+1 (binding)
- Built from source
- Checked the signatures of the source and binary release artifacts
- Ran pulsar standalone
- Checked producer and consumer
- Verified the Cassandra connector
- Verified the Stateful function
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno ven 17 mag 2024 alle ore 10:56
+1 binding
- Validated checksum and signature
- Compared source tarballs with the git tag ones
- Ran build and tests with JDK17 - all green
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno gio 16 mag 2024 alle ore 09:26 guo jiwei
ha scritto:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - checked sha512 checksum
> - ch
+1 binding
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 30 apr 2024 alle ore 00:34 Dave Fisher
ha scritto:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I see no risk to this. The admin will know to turn on this feature should it
> be required.
>
> Best,
> Dave
>
> > On Apr 29, 2024, at 3:13 PM, Raja
I personally agree with NOT including it in 3.3.x
Following the release policy, it should be time to start preparing the
3.3.x branch soon.
Also I wonder if the release line after 3.3.x will be 4.0, given that
3.0 has been released almost 1y ago and the LTS should be cut every 18
months.
Having th
+1 binding
- Validated checksum and signature
- Compared source tarballs with the git tag ones
- Ran build and tests with JDK21 - all green
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno dom 14 apr 2024 alle ore 14:16 guo jiwei
ha scritto:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - validate checksum
> - val
Nicolò Boschi
-- Forwarded message -
Da: Nicolò Boschi
Date: gio 11 apr 2024 alle ore 15:51
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.16.5 released
To: , , <
annou...@apache.org>
The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version
4.16.5.
Apache Book
+1 binding
- Verified checksum and signatures
- Installed default Pulsar on K3S, test simple produce and consume working
well
- Verified default image pointing to Pulsar 3.0.3
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 20 mar 2024 alle ore 19:15 David Jensen
ha scritto:
> +1 (bind
project if the maintainer just
stops working on it.
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno ven 15 mar 2024 alle ore 19:00 Zixuan Liu ha
scritto:
> +1
>
> This is a good idea that using Gestalt config, which supports json, yaml,
> env and so on.
>
> One notice that Gestalt requires Java 11 or
+1, great ideas
Let's make sure there's a dedicated section in the docs on how to "migrate"
from pulsar-all:3.2.0 to "build your own -all image"
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 6 mar 2024 alle ore 04:22 Matteo Merli
ha scritto:
> I was proposing `pulsar-function
Congratulations!
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 21 feb 2024 alle 07:29 Zike Yang ha scritto:
> Congratulations!
>
> BR,
> Zike Yang
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 2:22 PM Hang Chen wrote:
> >
> > Congratulations Asaf!
> >
> > Best,
>
+1 binding
- Validated checksum and signature
- Compared source tarballs with the git tag ones
- Ran build and tests with JDK21 - all green
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 19 feb 2024 alle ore 18:06 Enrico Olivelli <
eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Val
+1 binding
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno gio 21 dic 2023 alle 21:21 Lari Hotari ha
scritto:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Lari
>
>
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 22:10, Chris Bono wrote:
> >
> > I'm starting the vote for PIP-326, since it has been reviewed by
> > severa
+1 (binding)
- followed instructions here:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-reactive/wiki/Release-process#release-validation
.
- ran unit tests with "gradle test"
Tested on jdk17 and M3 MacOS
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno gio 14 dic 2023 alle ore 07:18 Lari Hotari
ha scritto:
>
Congrats!
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 21 nov 2023 alle ore 07:56 Horizon <1060026...@qq.com.invalid>
ha scritto:
> Congrats!
>
>
+1 binding
I followed the instructions from here -
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-reactive
/wiki/Release-process#release-validation .
Il giorno gio 16 nov 2023 alle 10:22 Lari Hotari ha
scritto:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - verified source package checksum and signature.
> - verified staged m
Congrats!!
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 13 nov 2023 alle ore 15:26 Xiangying Meng <
xiangy...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> Congrats! Yubiao.
>
> Thanks,
> Xiangying
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 8:15 PM Kai Wang wrote:
>
> > Congrats!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kai
> >
>
+1 binding
I followed the instructions from here -
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-reactive
/wiki/Release-process#release-validation .
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 4 ott 2023 alle ore 12:42 Enrico Olivelli
ha scritto:
> My command was wrong, you have to use "--verify&
+1 binding
Thanks
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 15 ago 2023 alle ore 10:39 Baodi Shi ha
scritto:
> +1(non-binding)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Baodi Shi
>
>
> On Aug 15, 2023 at 01:26:21, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks
> > Enrico
that tison has accepted.
>
> tison is very active in the community by contributing and reviewing
> many PRs, actively engaging on the mailing list, triaging GitHub
> Issues, and helping out with the website.
>
> On behalf of the Pulsar PMC, welcome and congratulations to tison!
>
> Best,
> Michael
>
--
Nicolò Boschi
detailed explanation of the
features.
Here [1] you can find the GitHub repo, it is Apache 2 Licensed.
Here [2] you can find the docs.
Feel free to try it out and report your feedback.
It’s an OSS project, so anyone is welcome to contribute !
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
--
[0]
https
+1 binding
As long as we don't introduce any breaking change and the new parameters
are covered by unit test
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 11 lug 2023 alle ore 05:00 Qiang Zhao
ha scritto:
> +1(binding)
>
> Best,
> Mattison
>
> On 2023/07/07 09:25:22 Joo Hyuk Kim
+1 binding
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 29 mag 2023 alle ore 09:04 徐昀泽 ha
scritto:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
> > On May 29, 2023, at 09:17, PengHui Li wrote:
> >
> > +1(binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Penghui
> >
> >
+1 binding
I'm happy that we're going to improve the monitoring tools for
transactions,
which is probably the aspect that is lacking more from a user perspective
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 10 mag 2023 alle ore 10:58 Xiangying Meng <
xiangy...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> Hel
ElasticSearch sink
- Pulsar Shell commands
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 1 mag 2023 alle ore 23:45 Matteo Merli
ha scritto:
> +1
>
> Checked signatures, standalone & docker images.
>
>
> --
> Matteo Merli
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 8:32 A
+1 binding
- verified signatures and checksum
- ran all tests from src artifact with jdk17 and gradle 8
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 26 apr 2023 alle ore 10:44 Enrico Olivelli <
eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> +1 (binding)
> - Run unit tests locally (It turned out that I had a p
ept:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19849
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20086
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I understand that the optimization PRs are nice but if we start
> to
> > &g
ds
> time to get awareness by everyone since it's the first time we do it.
> I hope everyone will eventually understand why we do that and that
> from now on there will be discussion and notification of the RMs
> before cherry-picking to the release branch.
>
> Thanks
&g
ey can ask in the release slack
channel.
The release managers will eventually cherry-pick it.
If there's no consensus then the discussion is moved to the mailing list. I
believe this wouldn't happen often, considering that currently we rely on
the common sense of committers.
What do you t
point - which could be addressed in another moment
- is that non persistent topics are not configurable at namespace/topic
level.
Please let me know what you think
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
sue using the "Flaky test" template at
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/new/choose
3) Please comment on the issue that you are working on.
More contributions are welcome!
Nicolò Boschi
Congrats, well deserved!
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 29 mar 2023 alle ore 09:09 Zike Yang ha
scritto:
> Congratulations! Qiang Zhao
>
> Best,
> Zike Yang
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 3:04 PM houxiaoyu wrote:
> >
> > Congratulations !
> >
> > Hou Xia
+1 (binding)
- verified checksum/signatures
- build and tests passing w jdk17 on Mac Intel
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 7 mar 2023 alle ore 09:57 Enrico Olivelli
ha scritto:
> Nice work Christophe, thanks for driving this release
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - verified checksums/signa
m 1.8.0, but I think that we need to get that
fixed in 1.8.1
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 22 feb 2023 alle ore 10:17 Baodi Shi ha
scritto:
> Hi, @Nicolò Boschi
>
> Is your system macOS(arm64)?
>
> Maybe you should set tlsTrustCertsFilePath:
>
> const client = new Pulsar.C
console.log("send message " + i);
}
await producer.flush();
await producer.close();
await client.close();
```
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 22 feb 2023 alle ore 08:02 Yunze Xu
ha scritto:
> +1 (binding)
> * Verified checksum and signature
> * Build from source
> *
+1
Also this fix is quite important:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/pull/126
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 7 feb 2023 alle ore 05:41 Baodi Shi ha
scritto:
> +1
>
> I'll do the release work on this version.
>
> Thanks,
> Baodi Shi
>
>
> 在 20
b.com/apache/pulsar/issues?q=PulsarDebeziumOracleSourceTest.testDebeziumOracleDbSource+testDebeziumOracleDbSource>
PendingAckPersistentTest and MetadataStoreStatsTest are already fixed.
The other ones already have an issue and they're long standing flaky tests
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno ma
+1 (binding)
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno gio 9 feb 2023 alle ore 11:17 Zike Yang ha
scritto:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Zike Yang
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 5:28 PM PengHui Li wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Penghui
> >
> &
> > >
> > > > > > +1
> > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > Bonan Hou
> > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 9:56 PM Alexander Preuss
> > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > I'm starting the VOTE for PIP-237: Make PulsarAdmin accessible
> in
> > >
> > > > > > > SinkContext and SourceContext:
> > >
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19123
> > >
> > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > Discussion thread:
> > >
> > > > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/b8r6b4p87qzfgfwmqfql7mqx8kmgorxg
> > >
> > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > I'd like to go ahead with implementing option B presented in
> the
> > >
> > > PIP
> > >
> > > > > > > description on GitHub.
> > >
> > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > > > > > Alexander
> > >
> > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
--
Nicolò Boschi
Matteo,
Can you start the vote for this PIP?
We should start working on 3.0.0 soon and this PIP is required to
reach community consensus.
https://lists.apache.org/thread/d6rk2ntzwk8twznf82k7o6xgyb2k9s14
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 9 nov 2022 alle ore 09:37 Haiting Jiang <
jiangh
simplified
the way to generate the report to allow more people to access the report
and for scheduling purpose.
There are instructions on how to generate it here:
https://github.com/nicoloboschi/pulsar-flakes#generate-a-new-report
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
+1
There will be ~70 commits compared to 2.10.3 which I think it's a good
amount of changes.
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno gio 2 feb 2023 alle ore 07:53 Haiting Jiang <
jianghait...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> +1, It's about 3 months since the discussion of the 2.10.3 r
+1 for going with default = true in the next release (3.0/2.12)
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 30 gen 2023 alle ore 05:31 ha
scritto:
> Hi, Asaf, Yunze
> > You mean to say, if the topic is partitioned, the word "partition" can
> notappear in the submitted topic name, in
Hei
I can't find the "-all" docker image on dockerhub:
https://hub.docker.com/r/apachepulsar/pulsar-all/tags?page=1&name=2.9
The base image has been uploaded correctly
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 3 gen 2023 alle ore 14:11 丛搏 ha scritto:
> The Apache Pulsar team is pr
+1
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 30 gen 2023 alle ore 09:33 Zike Yang ha
scritto:
> Thanks for your PR. I think this looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Zike Yang
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 4:23 PM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
> >
> > I totally agree.
> >
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 24 gen 2023 alle ore 20:11 Michael Marshall <
mmarsh...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:13 AM Andrey Yegorov
> wrote:
> >
> > I am starti
me delays for the first LTS
release.
I'd be happy to guide the 3.0 release
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno ven 20 gen 2023 alle ore 11:46 Christophe Bornet <
bornet.ch...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> We could create the release branch some days after the Chinese holidays.
> The idea is
uch as transactions and schemas.
> >
> > Welcome Bo Cong to the Apache Pulsar PMC.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Penghui on behalf of the Pulsar PMC
>
--
Nicolò Boschi
Hi folks,
Now that Pulsar 2.11.0 has been released I'd like to discuss possible
improvements for Pulsar shell's user experience.
Now you either download the tarball or use a docker image, we can improve
it.
I've opened an issue with some ideas:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19272
Pleas
+1
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 16 gen 2023 alle ore 11:17 Lari Hotari
ha scritto:
> Hello community,
>
> I'm starting the VOTE for PIP-243: Register Jackson Java 8 support modules
> by default.
>
> Motivation:
> Jackson has a separate Java 8 support modules for a
rified TLS,
offloads, transactions and ElasticSearch sink
- Pulsar Shell commands
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 4 gen 2023 alle ore 12:33 丛搏 ha scritto:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> system: mac os 12.6, Apple M1
> maven: 3.8.5
> java: OpenJDK 17.0.3
>
> - Checked the signatur
Congrats!
Il giorno ven 30 dic 2022 alle 09:59 Yan Zhao ha
scritto:
> Congratulations !
>
--
Nicolò Boschi
github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19043
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 21 dic 2022 alle ore 16:28 Yunze Xu
ha scritto:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Checked the signature
> - Build from source
> - Start standalone with KoP master (1e5433d)
> - Verify Pulsar client 2.11.0, Kafka client 3.
hanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 13 dic 2022 alle ore 13:18 Yunze Xu
ha scritto:
> I found another breaking change. Please take a look at this PR:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/18909
>
> I've also created a discussion at dev mail list, which can be found in
> the P
Just realized that the error doesn't block the producer but it's only
related to some DNS caching optimizations.
I believe we can proceed with the current rc
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 7 dic 2022 alle ore 17:40 Nicolò Boschi
ha scritto:
> I'm sorry but I think I'v
://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/18806
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 7 dic 2022 alle ore 16:53 Zixuan Liu ha
scritto:
> Ok, sounds good.
>
> Thanks,
> Zixuan
>
> PengHui Li 于2022年12月7日周三 16:10写道：
>
> > > I'm wondering whether affecting the resource quota. Co
he doc? If so,
we could add a note there.
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 7 dic 2022 alle ore 09:08 Haiting Jiang <
jianghait...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> We already have working procedures to change the public API, like PIP
> , mail-discussion and the PR templates.
>
Sorry I meant this JDK issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8281181
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 5 dic 2022 alle ore 11:15 Nicolò Boschi
ha scritto:
> Frank,
> Thanks for reporting, there may be several users hitting this common issue
> without even being aware of it
>
> M
this issue would be
resolved as well.
[0] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18716
[1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/18718
BR,
Nicolò Boschi
h JDK 17 at runtime even though there
are no tests and it's recommended to test it in your dev environment.
Pulsar 2.11.0 and onwards will REQUIRE jdk 17 on the server side.
Pulsar 2.11.0 rc2 includes openjdk 17.0.5 that contains the above fix.
Cheers,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno sab 3 dic 202
me flaky tests might be actual real production code bugs. Fixing
the flaky test might result in fixing a real production code bug.
More contributions are welcome! Please keep up the good work!
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
+1
This is the same we do in BookKeeper but for the docs in general (not only
API) but the concept is the same.
In BookKeeper we only have one doc version per minor.
https://bookkeeper.apache.org/releases
If a patch introduces a change for some reason (likely security reasons)
the rule is to explic
believe you can just push the
additional artifacts without invalidating the rc.
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 23 nov 2022 alle ore 10:51 guo jiwei
ha scritto:
> Hi Haiting
>
> > Is this expected or a bug?
> Yes, it's expected. we can ignore this step. I will cor
Congrats!
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 22 nov 2022 alle ore 06:23 Hang Chen ha
scritto:
> Congrats!
>
> Best,
> Hang
>
> tison 于2022年11月22日周二 13:15写道：
> >
> > Congrats!
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> >
> > Max Xu 于2022年
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Being a committer enables easier contribution to the
> > > > > > project since there is no need to go via the patch
> > > > > > submission process. This should enable better productivity.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Welcome and congratulations, Lin Chen!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please join us in congratulating and welcoming Lin Chen onboard!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > Penghui on behalf of the Pulsar PMC
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > BR,
> > > > Qiang Huang
> > > >
> > >
>
--
Nicolò Boschi
to reproduce the problem
> with
> > > > > > Pulsar.
> > > > > > >>>>>> I believe that it will take at least another week before
> having more
> > > > > > >>>>>> results about the investigations I am doing on BK. The
> problem is
> > > > > > >>>>>> reproducible only on a long-running test (more than 4
> hours) of a
> > > > > > >>>>>> third party project and only in some private QA
> environment.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Thoughts ?
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Enrico
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 2:15 PM Michael Marshall <
> mmarsh...@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> I am concerned that we have too many active release
> branches, and
> > > > > > planning
> > > > > > >>> to follow 2.11.0 with 3.0.0 soon after feels like it will
> make that
> > > > > > problem
> > > > > > >>> worse. As it is, we already need to discuss EOL for 2.7 and
> 2.8.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>> Michael
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 7:55 PM PengHui Li <
> peng...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> Releasing from the master branch will bring more
> uncertainty, no?
> > > > > > >>>> We have fixed many regressions that were introduced to
> branch-2.11.
> > > > > > >>>> If we cut a new branch-2.11 based on the master branch.
> Maybe new
> > > > > > >>>> regressions
> > > > > > >>>> will happen again. This may make us wait another month to
> have a
> > > > > > 2.11.0
> > > > > > >>>> release.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> IMO, we can start Pulsar 3.0 (follow
> > > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15966)
> > > > > > >>>> after 2.11.0 is released instead of waiting for 3 more
> months.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> For https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3466
> > > > > > >>>> I don't think it's a blocker for the Pulsar release for now.
> > > > > > >>>> Yes, it is worth investigating more. We also tried a chaos
> test for
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > >>>> case.
> > > > > > >>>> We haven't reproduced the problem on Pulsar.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Now, we are just waiting for the new BookKeeper release
> 4.15.3 since
> > > > > > >>> 4.15.2
> > > > > > >>>> has regressions [1]
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3523
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>>> Penghui
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 3:10 AM Michael Marshall <
> mmarsh...@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> I have not followed the branch-2.11 work closely, but I
> think it
> > > > > > makes
> > > > > > >>>>> sense to re-create branch-2.11 from the current master.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> We created branch-2.11 almost 3 months ago. Re-creating
> the branch
> > > > > > >>>>> will prevent unnecessary delay on new features added over
> the past 3
> > > > > > >>>>> months.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> If we follow through with this proposal, we will need to
> clean up PR
> > > > > > >>>>> tags and milestones to prevent confusion.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>>>> Michael
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 3:31 AM Enrico Olivelli <
> eolive...@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Hello Pulsar fellows,
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> I think that too much time passed since we wanted to cut
> 2.11.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> The branch-2.11 contains some code used by no one.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> In the meantime many features went into master branch,
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> I don't think that it is worth it to cut a release from
> branch-2.11
> > > > > > >>>>>> and start with something that is already stale.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> I propose to drop branch-2.11 and create a new branch out
> of the
> > > > > > >>>>>> current master branch and start the period of hardening
> before
> > > > > > >>> cutting
> > > > > > >>>>>> the release.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> IIUC we are waiting for this BookKeeper issue to be
> confirmed or
> > > > > > >>> fixed
> > > > > > >>>>>> or closed as "not a problem":
> > > > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3466
> > > > > > >>>>>> I am personally working on that case together with the
> folks you
> > > > > > >>>>>> created the issue.
> > > > > > >>>>>> Honestly I have never been able to reproduce the problem
> with
> > > > > > Pulsar.
> > > > > > >>>>>> I believe that it will take at least another week before
> having more
> > > > > > >>>>>> results about the investigations I am doing on BK. The
> problem is
> > > > > > >>>>>> reproducible only on a long-running test (more than 4
> hours) of a
> > > > > > >>>>>> third party project and only in some private QA
> environment.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Thoughts ?
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Enrico
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
>
--
Nicolò Boschi
Congrats!
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno gio 10 nov 2022 alle ore 08:25 Aloys Zhang
ha scritto:
> Congratulations! tison
>
> Enrico Olivelli 于2022年11月10日周四 15:09写道：
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il Gio 10 Nov 2022, 08:07 Haiting Jiang
Congrats!!
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 18 ott 2022 alle ore 16:55 Michael Marshall <
mmarsh...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> Congratulations Haiting!
>
> - Michael
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 3:06 AM Hang Chen wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The Apache
+1 non binding
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 18 ott 2022 alle ore 10:47 Enrico Olivelli <
eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno gio 13 ott 2022 alle ore 19:35 Christophe Bornet
> ha scritto:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
&g
ugs. Fixing
the flaky test might result in fixing a real production code bug.
More contributions are welcome! Please keep up the good work!
(Also thanks to Lari for all the work done to have these clean reports)
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Congrats!
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno ven 14 ott 2022 alle ore 09:18 Jiaqi Shen
ha scritto:
> Congratulations!
>
> (Are you BUPTer?🤔 )
>
> Thanks,
> Jiaqi Shen
>
>
> Jun Ma 于2022年10月14日周五 14:55写道：
>
> > Congratulations, Qiang!
> > ___
Absolutely +1
Thanks Michael
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 12 ott 2022 alle ore 08:56 Yu ha scritto:
> +1, thank you, Michael!
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 1:00 PM Matteo Merli
> wrote:
>
> > +1 Thanks Michael for fixing these!
> >
> >
> >
> >
+1 (non binding)
- Checksum and signatures
- Apache Rat check passes
- Compile from source w JDK11
- Build docker image from source
- Run Pulsar standalone and produce-consume from CLI
- Tested a couple of connectors (ElasticSink, JDBC sink) in K8S env
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 26 set
I've found another release blocker about client compatibility with jdk8/11,
please review https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17873
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno ven 16 set 2022 alle ore 10:54 Nicolò Boschi
ha scritto:
> Actually Yong found the root cause of the issue, see
+1 (non binding)
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 27 set 2022 alle ore 10:17 Qiang Huang <
qiang.huang1...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Yunze Xu 于2022年9月27日周二 11:35写道：
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yunze
> >
> &g
t.
But I found another release blocker here:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17690
After that, I think we should go forward and continue with the release.
Pulsar 2.11 will contain awesome features and we already have held it too
much based on the release schedule.
Regards,
Nicolò Boschi
Hi all,
I found a regression during the potential upgrade to 2.10.2 (and also
2.11).
I created a fix here: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17690 and set
as blocker for the release
Please review
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 7 set 2022 alle ore 16:12 Haiting Jiang <
jiangh
BK 4.15.0 raised by
the Pravega team (https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3466) but we
can't wait for them.
We don't know if the same issue applies to Pulsar and the time for: find
the issue - fix it - cut a release may be weeks or months.
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno lun 5 set 202
this situation.
We're waiting for updates from the Github support issue that Lari reported.
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno ven 9 set 2022 alle ore 04:09 Michael Marshall <
mmarsh...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> Fantastic, thank you Lari and Nicolò!
>
> - Michael
>
> On Thu, Sep
Done
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno ven 9 set 2022 alle ore 08:32 Nicolò Boschi
ha scritto:
> That's a good observation. We don't have data so we can't be sure about
> that, but I think that it can be a possible cause of the recent congestion.
>
> I opene
ll come back to this thread when it's done
Regards,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno ven 9 set 2022 alle ore 06:27 Lari Hotari ha
scritto:
> Good points Hang. Yes, let's remove the "update branch" button since it
> seems to lead to unnecessary load for CI.
>
> -Lari
>
; that indicates the Pulsar CI successfully passed
There's a slight chance that the CI will be stuck again in the next few
days but we will take it monitored.
Thanks Lari for the nice work!
Regards,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno gio 8 set 2022 alle ore 10:55 Lari Hotari ha
scritto:
> Than
t is suggested to run
the actions in your own Pulsar fork. Please don’t re-run failed jobs or
push any other commits to avoid triggering new actions
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno gio 8 set 2022 alle ore 09:42 Nicolò Boschi
ha scritto:
> Thanks Lari for the detailed explanation. This is
ain in .asf.yaml, in
the meantime be careful about merging PRs
> 10. Fix quarantined flaky tests
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno gio 8 set 2022 alle ore 09:27 Lari Hotari ha
scritto:
> If my assumption of the GitHub usage metrics bug in the GitHub Actions
> build job queue fairness algorithm
+1 (non binding)
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 31 ago 2022 alle ore 17:00 Christophe Bornet <
bornet.ch...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Le mer. 31 août 2022 à 16:06, Lari Hotari a écrit :
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is the official VOTE thread f
Absolutely +1, great initiative
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 31 ago 2022 alle ore 04:22 guo jiwei
ha scritto:
> +1
>
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 10:22 AM Zixuan Liu wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Best regards,
&g
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
