Re: [VOTE] PIP-184: Topic specific consumer priorityLevel

gt; > > > Regards > > > > > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:54 AM PengHui Li > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > >

[VOTE] PIP-184: Topic specific consumer priorityLevel

Hi Pulsar Community I would like to start a VOTE on "PIP-184: Topic specific consumer priorityLevel". The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16481 and the discussion thread is available at https://lists.apache.org/thread/5zs4gd3r0rtzz16nv62o8ntygg01qjhq Voting will

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-184: Cluster migration or Blue-Green cluster deployment support in Pulsar

Hi Rajan, Just a note that 184 was already taken by https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16481 - Dave On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 6:23 PM Rajan Dhabalia wrote: > Hi, > > We have created PIP-184 which helps users to perform cluster migration with > Apache Pulsar. Cluster migration or Blue-Green

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-184: Topic specific consumer priorityLevel

7867ff54327c1f2940e72f08a44a5dc5f7/pulsar-client/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/impl/conf/ConsumerConfigurationData.java#L58 > > Zike Yang > > > > Zike Yang > > > On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 12:10 AM Dave Maughan > wrote: > > > > Hi Enrico, > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-184: Topic specific consumer priorityLevel

dependent Consumers ? > They will share the same resources (memory pools, thread pools) > > > > > Enrico > > Il giorno ven 8 lug 2022 alle ore 15:00 Dave Maughan > ha scritto: > > > > Hi Pulsar community, > > > > I've opened a PIP to di

[DISCUSS] PIP-184: Topic specific consumer priorityLevel

Hi Pulsar community, I've opened a PIP to discuss a new Java client option to allow setting topic specific consumer priorityLevel. Proposal Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16481 --- ## Motivation The Pulsar Java consumer supports setting a priority level for priority message disp

Re: [DISCUSS] [PIP-179] Support the admin API to check unknown request parameters

Hi Yubiao, +1 Is there any intention in the future to change this to the default behaviour, in 3.0.0? I assume there are going to be some other areas of the code base and integrations that would need to deal with the new failure mode. So it does make sense to phase this in gradually. Is that the

Re: [DISCUSS] Reject partitioned topic creation when the topic name contains the `partition` keyword.

Hi Mattison, 1. Should we reject the partitioned topic metadata creation when the topic > name contains the `-partition-` keywords? I'm not familiar with all the details but my naive opinion would be that we should avoid placing constraints on users if we can. In this case that would mean removi