Re: [VOTE] [PIP-144] Making SchemaRegistry implementation configurable

2022-03-14 Thread Aparajita Singh
Thanks Hang. Closing this vote with 3 (+1) bindings and 0 (-1). On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 19:01, Hang Chen wrote: > Hi Aparajita, > Thanks for you contribution. This proposal has 3 (+1) bindings and > 0 (-1). You can close this vote now and the proposal has been > accepted. > &g

Re: [VOTE] [PIP-144] Making SchemaRegistry implementation configurable

2022-03-14 Thread Aparajita Singh
Thanks for reviewing and voting. Can the proposal be accepted now? On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 06:47, Hang Chen wrote: > +1 > > Thanks, > Hang > > Aparajita Singh 于2022年3月11日周五 10:41写道: > > > > *bump* > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2022, 18:30 Peng

Re: [VOTE] [PIP-144] Making SchemaRegistry implementation configurable

2022-03-10 Thread Aparajita Singh
*bump* On Wed, 9 Mar 2022, 18:30 PengHui Li, wrote: > +1 > > Penghui > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:27 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Enrico > > > > Il giorno mer 9 mar 2022 alle ore 06:39 Aparajita Singh > > ha s

[VOTE] [PIP-144] Making SchemaRegistry implementation configurable

2022-03-08 Thread Aparajita Singh
Hi, I would like to start a vote for PIP-144: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/14395 Discussion thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/z97cvs8mvhlydv8rbnqk4d0c7mp8rwt3 -- Thanks, Aparajita

Re: [PIP] #14395 Making SchemaRegistry implementation configurable

2022-03-07 Thread Aparajita Singh
ng the current names). I guess > that's probably due to the misleading nature of the method names. We > should double-check these usages to make sure the expected operation > is applied. > > Matteo > > > -- > Matteo Merli > > > On Mon, Feb

[PIP] #14395 Making SchemaRegistry implementation configurable

2022-02-21 Thread Aparajita Singh
Hi, Please review this proposal: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/14395 -- Thanks, Aparajita