Re: [VOTE] PIP-404： Introduce per-ledger properties

Tao, I think that the proposal is valuable. We have to clarify which datatypes are supported both for the keys and for the values. Are keys and values only raw arrays of bytes? It would be better to have a way to detect the types, so that automatic tools, like CLIs and UIs can represent the value

Re: [VOTE] PIP-407 Add a newMessage API to create a message with a schema and transaction

+1 nonbinding Ómar Yasin 于2025年2月11日周二 02:21写道： > Hi, > > I'd like to start the voting thread for PIP-407: Add a newMessage API to > create a message with a schema and transaction > > Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23942 > Rendered PIP document: > https://github.com/apache/pu

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-406: Introduce pulsar_subscription_dispatch_throttled_msgs and bytes metrics

+1 it's helpful to locate related issues Baodi Shi 于2025年2月7日周五 17:31写道： > I have created a PIP to introduce > pulsar_subscription_dispatch_throttled_msgs and bytes metrics > > PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23945 > > Thanks, > Baodi Shi >

[VOTE] PIP-404： Introduce per-ledger properties

Hi all, I open PIP-404 to introduce per ledger properties, which will add a `properties` field to `LedgerInfo` to store extra properties for every `Ledger`. # Background knowledge As we don't have a secondary index on the Bookkeeper, so we can't query entries by message metadata efficiently. The

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-404: Introduce per ledger properties

bump Tao Jiuming 于2025年1月24日 周五14:11写道： > bump > > looking for feedback > > Tao Jiuming 于2025年1月16日 周四15:55写道： > >> bump >> >> Tao Jiuming 于2025年1月15日周三 15:57写道： >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I open PIP-404 to introduce per ledger properties, which will add a >>> `properties` field to `LedgerInfo` to s

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-406: Introduce pulsar_subscription_dispatch_throttled_msgs and bytes metrics

Hi Baodi I think the new subscription stats variable is useful. And I left a little comment under the PIP PR Thanks Yubiao Feng On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 5:31 PM Baodi Shi wrote: > I have created a PIP to introduce > pulsar_subscription_dispatch_throttled_msgs and bytes metrics > > PR: https://gi

Re: [VOTE] PIP-407 Add a newMessage API to create a message with a schema and transaction

+1 (binding) -Lari On 2025/02/10 18:20:56 Ómar Yasin wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to start the voting thread for PIP-407: Add a newMessage API to > create a message with a schema and transaction > > Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23942 > Rendered PIP document: > https://githu

[VOTE] PIP-407 Add a newMessage API to create a message with a schema and transaction

Hi, I'd like to start the voting thread for PIP-407: Add a newMessage API to create a message with a schema and transaction Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23942 Rendered PIP document: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/a5953b16729b703eb5682c37cb42c1061b8f480b/pip/pip-407.

Re: [VOTE] PIP-395: Add Proxy configuration to support configurable response headers for http reverse-proxy

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Lun 10 Feb 2025, 11:11 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > -Lari > > On 2025/02/06 20:59:32 Rajan Dhabalia wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to start voting thread for PIP-395 to add support for > > configurable response headers in http reverse-proxy > > > > PIP

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-407 Add a newMessage API to create a message with a schema and transaction

Makes sense, thanks for the proposal. You can start a VOTE thread for the proposal so that we can continue with the process in getting it included. Here's an example of a VOTE thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/z1kgo34qfkkvdnn3l007bdvjr3qqf4rw . -Lari On 2025/02/07 17:38:18 Ómar Yasin wro

Re: [VOTE] PIP-395: Add Proxy configuration to support configurable response headers for http reverse-proxy

+1 (binding) -Lari On 2025/02/06 20:59:32 Rajan Dhabalia wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to start voting thread for PIP-395 to add support for > configurable response headers in http reverse-proxy > > PIP design PR: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23648 > > Thread: > https://lists.apache