Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-386: Add resetIncludeHead in CommandSubscribe for startMessageIdInclusive implementation

Same PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/14883 FYI. Jiawen Wang <15353143...@163.com> 于2024年10月9日周三 23:43写道： > Hi dev, I proposed a PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23427, > this pip is intended to fix issue > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/23239. > > Please take a lo

Re: [DISCUSS] Revert the PR 23395, which broke the behavior of schemas

Hi Ranjan, Lari > Until then I have created a PR to resolve this disagreement with your suggestion: > PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23428 Make sense. I think we can close the discussion. Thanks Yubiao Feng On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 4:17 AM Rajan Dhabalia wrote: > Let me answer each

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-385 Add rate limit semantics to pulsar protocol and Java client

I've updated the proposal with suggestions from Lari about utilization based rate limit exceptions on clients, along with a minor change in the blocking section to ensure ordering is maintained. Please have a look again. Regarding this comment: > Well, even if we have throttle producer protocol,