+1 (binding)
- Verified checksum and signatures
- Tested producer and consumer
Regards,
Penghui
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 4:56 AM Yunze Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified checksum and signatures
> - Built from source with Go 1.22
> - Ran the perf tools
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
> On Fri, Sep 27
>> I'd hope to see these used for storing individual acks in Pulsar, but it
>> seems to be too late to handle that when there are already other
>> implementations that are sufficient for solving the problem.
I think we can make PositionInfo ser/dser code and its interface
generic, so that Pulsar
+1 this will be also helpful to enhance various dispatch definitions at the
broker.
Thanks,
Rajan
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 11:31 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Dear Pulsar Community,
>
> I have created PIP-384: ManagedLedger interface decoupling, which
> documents recent improvements to Pulsar's Manage
Hi,
>> It's too bad that the PR reviews stalled in the past and the required
improvements did not get included in the project. It's frustrating when
this happens, especially for those who have put their time and effort into
contributing a valuable feature such as the one you contributed in PR 9292
Dear Pulsar Community,
I have created PIP-384: ManagedLedger interface decoupling, which
documents recent improvements to Pulsar's ManagedLedger component.
This PIP summarizes changes that have already been merged into the
master branch for Pulsar 4.0, as well as one remaining draft PR.
Problem:
Yes, it will be included. All changes going to master branch will be included.
Because of the pending changes, branch-4.0 is planned to be forked later, on
Oct 7th.
The pending changes were explained in more detail in
https://lists.apache.org/thread/qy8xp2ht0htvctlx2cwgrq2ppnjcp4m3 .
-Lari
On 2
Could you include my latest fix [1]? In our internal chaos test
environment, the issue happened many times that the ephemeral node
created by the broker registry was deleted so that the broker could
not serve any request.
[1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23359
Thanks,
Yunze
On Fri, Sep
Dear Apache Pulsar Community,
We're excited to announce the availability of Apache Pulsar
4.0.0-preview.1, a preview release aimed at gathering user feedback
for the upcoming Pulsar 4.0 LTS release. This preview is not an
official Apache release but provides an early look at the new features
and c
I think it's necessary to mention the target versions in the proposal.
I'd say that this proposal shouldn't go into branch-3.0 since it
breaks existing implementations of the AuthorizationProvider
interface.
This could be avoided by providing a compatible default implementation
of the interface me
+1 (binding)
- Verified checksum and signatures
- Built from source with Go 1.22
- Ran the perf tools
Thanks,
Yunze
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 4:46 PM Baodi Shi wrote:
>
> +1(binding)
>
> - verify source checksms
> - build from source(make build)
> - test produce and consumer samples
>
> env: go v
Hi Rajan,
It's too bad that the PR reviews stalled in the past and the required
improvements did not get included in the project. It's frustrating when this
happens, especially for those who have put their time and effort into
contributing a valuable feature such as the one you contributed in P
+1(binding)
- verify source checksms
- build from source(make build)
- test produce and consumer samples
env: go version go1.22.1 darwin/arm64
Thanks,
Baodi Shi
Zike Yang 于2024年9月23日周一 19:00写道：
>
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> 0.14.0, as
+1
@lari For this type of improved API, which is clearer and more
decoupled, can we include it in version 3.3?
Thanks,
Baodi Shi
Lari Hotari 于2024年9月27日周五 00:42写道：
>
> Thanks for driving this Jiwei.
> This will be useful in addressing the current challenge with concurrent
> modifications.
> Is
13 matches
Mail list logo
