+1 (binding)
Thanks for driving this initiative
Enrico Olivelli
Il Mar 23 Lug 2024, 10:20 Marek Czajkowski ha
scritto:
> Hi Enrico I have created discussion thread earlier but not many responses.
> Here is the thread link
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/nc8r3tm9xv03vl30zrmfhd19q2k308y2
>
> w
Il Gio 25 Lug 2024, 14:32 Marek Czajkowski ha
scritto:
> Hi all,
> I pushed a new proposal to enable another topic compaction mechanism based
> on eventTIme.
>
> Please take a look and share your thoughts. Thanks!
>
> Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22710
Thanks for updating the PIP
Although I agree with this direction, having the config in the lookup
requests, I have the following questions.
1. Given that the current pulsar assigns topics to brokers at the
bundle level, what happens with a topic lookup with rack info(rack A)
for the bundle that's already assigned to a differ
+1 (not binding)
Heesung
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 7:52 PM Jie crossover wrote:
>
> +1
> I left some comments in the PR.
> --
> Best Regards！
> crossoverJie
>
>
> Zike Yang 于2024年7月25日周四 11:15写道：
>
> > Hi, all,
> >
> > I proposed a new proposal to add client properties support for the
> > lookup:
