Re: [VOTE] PIP-354: apply topK mechanism to ModularLoadManagerImpl

2024-05-27 Thread Yubiao Feng
+1 (binding) Thanks Yubiao Feng On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 10:14 PM thetumbled wrote: > Hi, Pulsar Community. > I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-354: apply topK > mechanism to ModularLoadManagerImpl. > Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22765 > Implementation

Re: [VOTE] PIP-353: Improve transaction message visibility for peek-messages

2024-05-27 Thread Baodi Shi
Hi, all. >From this comment: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22762#discussion_r1615383124 I will use `---transaction-isolation-level` to instead of `--show-txn-uncommitted` and `--show-txn-aborted`. This way, we can maintain consistency with the interface behavior of the consume mentioned

Re: [VOTE] PIP-354: apply topK mechanism to ModularLoadManagerImpl

2024-05-27 Thread thetumbled
The vote is approved with 3 binding votes and close now. Votes: - Yunze Xu(binding) - Kai Wang(non-binding) - PengHui Li(binding) - guo jiwei(binding) Thank you all for verifying and voting! Wenzhi Feng.(thetumbled) On 2024/05/27 08:09:10 guo jiwei wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > > Regards > Jiwe

Re: [VOTE] PIP-354: apply topK mechanism to ModularLoadManagerImpl

2024-05-27 Thread guo jiwei
+1 (binding) Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 11:35 AM PengHui Li wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Penghui > > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:24 AM Kai Wang wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Kai > > >