Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pulsar 3.3.0 based on 3.3.0-candidate-2

-1 (binding) When verifying the `Functions` parts, it can't get the functions even if created them. The broker logs show that creating fn using the `default` namespace, but geting fn using the `test-namespace`. Then find the related fix in https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22209, it adds th

Re: [VOTE] PIP-353: Improve transaction message visibility for peek-messages

+1 (binding) BR, Zike Yang On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 9:55 PM Baodi Shi wrote: > > Hi, all > > I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-353. > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22746 > > The implementation PR is: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22762 > > Discuss thread: > https:/

[VOTE] PIP-353: Improve transaction message visibility for peek-messages

Hi, all I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-353. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22746 The implementation PR is: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22762 Discuss thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/dc7f64jtvg987ydztxpffqx88bp44lwv Thanks, Baodi Shi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pulsar 3.3.0 based on 3.3.0-candidate-2

+1 (binding) - Build from the source code - Checked the signatures - Start the standalone - Run Node.js client unit test with image: czcoder/pulsar:3.3.0-55ed823 - https://github.com/shibd/pulsar-client-node/actions/runs/9187138034/job/25264192973?pr=38 On 2024/05/20 04:25:10 Cong Zhao wrote: