+1 (binding)
Validated source artifacts
- checked sha512 checksum
- checked signature
Validated binaries
- ran sample app
-Lari
On 2024/04/10 18:32:06 Chris Bono wrote:
> Following PIP-205: Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar (
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/17335), this is releas
Following PIP-205: Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar (
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/17335), this is release
candidate 1 for the Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar, version 0.5.4.
*** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will stay open
for at least 72 hours
Moderators note. Colin is not subscribed to the mailing list. I’ve added them
to the cc:
> On Apr 10, 2024, at 9:56 AM, Colin Redmond wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am the author of the Gestalt library and I am honored that you are
> considering leveraging my library for your project.
>
> There are
Hello,
I am the author of the Gestalt library and I am honored that you are
considering leveraging my library for your project.
There are a lot of really great configuration libraries out there to
chose from, and I see you have already done your to do your due
diligence in reviewing many (i
the limitation seems make no sense, after
http://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22472 merged, I'll try to fix it.
Thanks,
Tao Jiuming
Yike Xiao 于2024年4月10日 周三16:58写道：
> Here's a hint as to why this restriction was introduced.
> After reviewing the current implementation of the retention policy, I
Here's a hint as to why this restriction was introduced.
After reviewing the current implementation of the retention policy, I found
that the logic for determining whether a ledger exceeds the retention size and
should be deleted is based on the following logic (pseudocode):
```
long totalSizeTo
