[DISCUSS] PIP-331: Replace configuration brokerServiceCompactionPhaseOneLoopTimeInSeconds with brokerServiceCompactionPhaseOneMessageReadTimeoutInSeconds

2024-01-16 Thread the tumbled
Hi Pulsar Community, I want to replace the conf brokerServiceCompactionPhaseOneLoopTimeInSeconds with brokerServiceCompactionPhaseOneMessageReadTimeoutInSeconds to fix the ambiguity. Please have a look at the pip: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21910. Thanks, TheTumbled.

Re: [VOTE]PIP-321: Split the responsibilities of namespace replication-clusters

2024-01-16 Thread PengHui Li
+1 (binding) Regards, Penghui On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 4:00 PM guo jiwei wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > Regards > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:41 PM Xiangying Meng > wrote: > > > Dear Pulsar community, > > > > I am initiating a voting thread for "PIP-321: Split the responsibili

Re: [VOTE] PIP-329: Strategy for maintaining the latest tag to Pulsar docker images

2024-01-16 Thread PengHui Li
+1 (binding) Regards, Penghui On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:05 AM guo jiwei wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > Regards > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 5:50 PM Zixuan Liu wrote: > > > +1(non-binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Zixuan > > > > Zike Yang 于2024年1月15日周一 16:14写道: > > > > > Hi, all >

Re: [DISCUSS] Always set a broker side timestamp for message and deprecate some API

2024-01-16 Thread PengHui Li
> User disabling `AppendBrokerTimestampMetadataInterceptor` does not mean that they allow this bug. This is a configuration, not an API. It is difficult to use documentation to regulate user behavior. Actually, they need to know why they want to disable ` AppendBrokerTimestampMetadataInterceptor`.

Re: [VOTE] PIP-329: Strategy for maintaining the latest tag to Pulsar docker images

2024-01-16 Thread guo jiwei
+1 (binding) Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 5:50 PM Zixuan Liu wrote: > +1(non-binding) > > Thanks, > Zixuan > > Zike Yang 于2024年1月15日周一 16:14写道: > > > Hi, all > > > > I'm starting the vote for PIP-329: Strategy for maintaining the latest > > tag to Pulsar docker images > >

Re: [VERIFY] Pulsar Release 3.2.0 Candidate 2

2024-01-16 Thread Zixuan Liu
+1 (non-binding) - Checked the checksums and signatures - Built with Temurin-17.0.6+10 - Run standalone - Checked producer and consumer Thanks, Zixuan guo jiwei 于2024年1月16日周二 15:57写道: > This is the second release candidate for Apache Pulsar version 3.2.0. > > It fixes the following issues: > h

Re: [VOTE]PIP-321: Split the responsibilities of namespace replication-clusters

2024-01-16 Thread guo jiwei
+1 (binding) Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:41 PM Xiangying Meng wrote: > Dear Pulsar community, > > I am initiating a voting thread for "PIP-321: Split the responsibilities of > namespace replication-clusters". > > Here is the pull request for PIP-321: > https://github.co