Re: [VOTE] PIP-313 Support force unsubscribe using consumer api

We can close this vote with 4 (binding) and 1(non-binding). Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 9:09 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Enrico > > Il giorno lun 11 dic 2023 alle ore 12:56 Yunze Xu ha > scritto: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Yunze > > > > On M

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-321 Split the responsibilities of namespace replication-clusters

Hi Xiangying, I think we can rename this PIP to: *Introduce `allowed-clusters` and `topic-policy-synchronized-clusters` to fully support replication on message and topic level* Currently, we can set replication clusters on the message and topic level, but the replication clusters should be

[DISCUSS] gRPC & Protobuf library upgrades (related to addressing CVE-2023-32732)

Hi all, I have started a thread on d...@bookkeeper.apache.org about gRPC & Protobuf library upgrades. You can follow and contribute to the discussion on this thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/odg7p617zwqjngq6fk6qf8xfzbfwgfgq Looking forward to your valuable input. -Lari

Re: [VOTE] Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar 0.5.1 Candidate 1

+1 (binding) - Verify the signature and checksum. - Verified staged maven artifacts by running the test HelloPulsarClientReactive We can correct the commit in this thread to v0.5.1-candidate-1 (92a1e390e854876b54936bd0e6d21bf1e5071aeb) Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 7:39 PM

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client C++ Release 3.4.2 Candidate 1

+1 (binding) - Checked the signature - Tested the producer and consumer Regards, Penghui On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 2:28 PM guo jiwei wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Verified the signature and checksum > - Build from the source > - Test SampleConsumer and SampleProducer > > Regards > Jiwei Guo (Tboy)

Re: [VOTE] Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar 0.5.1 Candidate 1

+0 The git commit is incorrect in the voting mail (d45c08827387bd8d2a0d6bdc542c2bf7e4ebcda8 instead of 92a1e390e854876b54936bd0e6d21bf1e5071aeb) I don't think it needs a new RC but I believe it needs a new voting mail with the correct commit. Regards Christophe Le mer. 13 déc. 2023 à 22:59, Chr

Re: [VOTE] PIP-322: Pulsar Rate Limiting Refactoring

Hello all, The vote to accept PIP-322: Pulsar Rate Limiting Refactoring is now closed. The vote PASSED with 5 binding "+1", 3 non-binding "+1" and 0 "-1" votes: "+1" Binding votes: - Jiwei Guo (Tboy) - Penghui - Mattison - Lari - Matteo "+1" Non-Binding votes: - Girish Sharma -

Re: [VOTE] Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar 0.5.1 Candidate 1

+1 (binding) - followed instructions here: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-reactive/wiki/Release-process#release-validation . - ran unit tests with "gradle test" Tested on jdk17 and M3 MacOS Nicolò Boschi Il giorno gio 14 dic 2023 alle ore 07:18 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > +1 (binding)