[VOTE] Pulsar Client C++ Release 3.4.0 Candidate 2

This is the second release candidate for Apache Pulsar Client C++, version 3.4.0. It fixes the following issues: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/milestone/5?closed=1 *** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will stay open for at least 72 hours *** Note that we ar

Re: [DISSCUSS] Don't retain null-key messages during topic compaction

Hi mattison, Thanks for your suggestion, I agree with you, we can add a configuration to smooth the migrate this change. Let's see if anyone else has any other ideas, and if everyone agrees with this approach, I'll implement it. Thanks, Cong Zhao On 2023/11/07 03:03:58 mattison chao wrote: >

Re: [DISSCUSS] Don't retain null-key messages during topic compaction

Hi, Cong IMO, Please do not break the previous directly. We can migrate it smoothly. We can add a configuration and give the Timeline of making this configuration default and removing it in the next release version. For example: - Add configuration: `compactionRemainNullKey=true` by default (

[DISSCUSS] Don't retain null-key messages during topic compaction

Hi, Pulsar community Currently, we retain all null-key messages during topic compaction, which I don't think is necessary because when you use topic compaction, it means that you want to retain the value according to the key, so retaining null-key messages is meaningless. Additionally, retaining

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-310: Support custom publish rate limiters

Hello Lari, inline once again. On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 5:44 PM Lari Hotari wrote: > Hi Girish, > > Replies inline. We are getting into a very detailed discussion. We > could also discuss this topic in one of the upcoming Pulsar Community > meetings. However, I might miss the next meeting that is

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-310: Support custom publish rate limiters

Hi Girish, Replies inline. We are getting into a very detailed discussion. We could also discuss this topic in one of the upcoming Pulsar Community meetings. However, I might miss the next meeting that is scheduled this Thursday. Although I am currently opposing to your proposal PIP-310, I am supp

[DISSCUSS] PIP-317: Add `bookkeeperDeleted` field to show whether a ledger is deleted from the Bookie while using tiered storage

Hi community, The motivation behind this PIP is to provide administrators and users with better insights into the state of the ledgers and the overall storage usage. By including the `bookkeeperDeleted` field in the `ledgers`, we can make it easier for users to understand the current state of t