* So I think we could not replace completely the Pulsar protocol by gRPC.
Sure, I understand that it’s unlikely possible to implement a full replacement.
I’m rather talking about it as a better, more type-safe alternative to
WebSocket and REST APIs, with a similar amount of supported features
I think that Christophe suggested the protocol handler approach like KoP (also
forked as DataStax Starlight for Kafka). Due to the several people on the PMC
contributing to that the performance gains were huge and it nearly as
performant as Pulsar.
Best,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 31,
It's a protocol handler like https://github.com/streamnative/kop that
supports the Kafka protocol. The protocol handler should not be
maintained in the core repo because there are a few people maintaining
the plugin.
And just like Christophe and Zike said, compared with the native
Pulsar protocol,
Another point is that there are many features implemented on the
client side, including batching, chunking, DLQ, etc. This makes it
hard to replace the existing pulsar clients completely.
Zike Yang
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 4:43 AM Christophe Bornet wrote:
>
> Hi Kiryl,
>
> Thanks for mentioning p
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21489 solved the problem "Error
reading from server. Remote end closed connection" while downloading
Eclipse Temurin apt packages.
I have cherry-picked this to branch-3.0 and branch-3.1 as well.
Pulsar CI is now unblocked.
-Lari
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 20:42,
Hi all,
On CI, some pulsar-metadata tests fail frequently with JVM crashes.
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x7f10670d5113, pid=3902, tid=3941
#
# JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment Temurin-17.0.8.1+1 (17.0.8.1+1)
(build 17.0
Hi All,
I just submitted a PIP to add an optional config to limit the max delay
allowed for delayed delivery. This would be helpful for Pulsar
administrators if they wanted to provide some limits on delayed delivery.
Link - https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21490
Thanks,
Kevin
Hi Kiryl,
Thanks for mentioning pulsar-grpc.
Indeed, using gRPC simplifies the implementation of the networking logic
(keep-alive, reconnection, flow control,…). On the other hand, the Java
gRPC implementation makes a lot of buffer copies to cleanly separate the
network and app layers but that tak
Hi! Am I understanding it right, that if this project
https://github.com/cbornet/pulsar-grpc is merged to the apache/pulsar repo, we
could easily cover non-mainstream platforms that are supported by gRPC, but
don't have ready-to-use Pulsar clients?
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-59:-
Attempt to fix the problem:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21489
-Lari
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, 20.33 Lari Hotari, wrote:
> There's another problem related to the Eclipse Temurin repository.
> Sometimes the Pulsar docker image building fails with an error "Error
> reading from server. Remote
10 matches
Mail list logo
