Re: [DISCUSS]PIP-295: Fixing Chunk Message Duplication Issue

Hi, xiangying, Thanks for your PIP. IIUC, this may change the existing behavior and may introduce inconsistencies. Suppose that we have a large message with 3 chunks. But the producer crashes and resends the message after sending the chunk-1. It will send a total of 5 messages to the Pulsar topic

Re: [VOTE] PIP-290 Support WSS E2E encryption and not need to expose the private key to the WebSocket Proxy

Hi Mattison > but anyway. IMO, it's better to split the > implementation PR into multiple that > will help the reviewer review this > PR more easily. Good suggestion. After removing tests, the amount of code lines should be very little. Mainly changes in the class `ProducerHandler`. > IMO, it's

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-281: Optimize Bundle Unload(Transfer) Protocol for ExtensibleLoadManager

> How long will it take to collect sufficient broker load data and bundle load data? It would be normally bounded by `loadBalancerReportUpdateMinIntervalMillis,` but in the worst case, `loadBalancerReportUpdateMaxIntervalMinutes`. > And the new leader might only know the new owner of that topic?