Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar 3.1.0 released

I have re-pushed the docker image, and the image for the intel arch can work now. BR, Zike Yang On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 6:29 PM Zike Yang wrote: > > Congratulations! > > I just found an issue with the pulsar:3.1.0 docker image: > There is only one arch supported `linux/arm64` for the pulsar:3.1.

Re: [NOTICE] CI Blocked due to Expired Test Certs

I merged and cherry picked the fix to all active branches. Thanks, Michael On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 6:07 PM Michael Marshall wrote: > > Hi Pulsar Community, > > I discovered today that our apache/pulsar repo CI is blocked due to > expired certs in our Pulsar IO Elasticsearch test. Here is the PR

Re: [NOTICE] CI Blocked due to Expired Test Certs

Please unsubscribe me from this mailing list Thanks! Brett On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 7:08 PM Michael Marshall wrote: > Hi Pulsar Community, > > I discovered today that our apache/pulsar repo CI is blocked due to > expired certs in our Pulsar IO Elasticsearch test. Here is the PR to > fix those c

[NOTICE] CI Blocked due to Expired Test Certs

Hi Pulsar Community, I discovered today that our apache/pulsar repo CI is blocked due to expired certs in our Pulsar IO Elasticsearch test. Here is the PR to fix those certs https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21001. Once the PR is merged, any blocked PRs will need to pick up these changes. It

Re: [Discuss] Release Pulsar Python Client 3.3.0

+1 Enrico Il Mar 15 Ago 2023, 14:04 Zike Yang ha scritto: > +1 > > BR, > Zike Yang > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 7:19 PM Baodi Shi wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar Python Client 3.3.0. > > > > It has been over 2 months since the last release (3.2.0). Th

Re: [DISCUSS] Consistent code style (esp. ws/indent) and autotools

These have been discussed that - 1. Cherrypick: we will reformat for all maintained branches. 2. Commit noise: metadata to filter out during blame. 3. PR rebased: invincible, while we don't have a large backlog or active large pending PR. But if our critical mass agree this is not a good tradeof

Re: [DISCUSS] Consistent code style (esp. ws/indent) and autotools

Tison, Il Mar 15 Ago 2023, 16:56 tison ha scritto: > A demostration for change set - > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20974 While I think it is great to start with Spotless for little projects or when you start from scratch, appling a patch that changes 3.000+ files will make it very h

Re: [DISCUSS] Consistent code style (esp. ws/indent) and autotools

A demostration for change set - https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20974 If we go forward this direction, it should be picked to branch-3.0 and branch-3.1. Earlier versions can be ported on demand and I'm glad to volunteer doing that. Best, tison. PengHui Li 于2023年7月10日周一 10:00写道： > My con

Re: [Discuss] Release Pulsar Python Client 3.3.0

+1 BR, Zike Yang On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 7:19 PM Baodi Shi wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar Python Client 3.3.0. > > It has been over 2 months since the last release (3.2.0). There have > been some new features and bug fixes since then. It's time to release > a

[Discuss] Release Pulsar Python Client 3.3.0

Hi all, I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar Python Client 3.3.0. It has been over 2 months since the last release (3.2.0). There have been some new features and bug fixes since then. It's time to release a new version. - https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-python/milestone/4?clo

Re: [VOTE] PIP 289: Secure Pulsar Connector Configuration

+1(non-binding) Thanks, Baodi Shi On Aug 15, 2023 at 01:26:21, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks > Enrico > > Il Gio 10 Ago 2023, 18:46 Michael Marshall ha > scritto: > > +1 (binding) > > > - Michael > > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:43 AM Michael Marshall > > wrote: > > > > >

[VOTE] PIP-293: Delete config `disableBrokerInterceptors`

Hi dev, There is a config in ServiceConfiguration called `disableBrokerInterceptors` introduced by #8157 , it looks to disable the broker interceptor, but commented for using test only. In actual, we judge whether enable the interceptor by judging whe

Re: [DISCUSS] About config `disableBrokerInterceptors`

Thanks, I will send the vote mail Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:43 AM Zixuan Liu wrote: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/8157 introduces the > `disableBrokerInterceptors` config and only for the web service, so > causes different behaviors between the broker ser