+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Ran Gao
On 2023/07/07 09:25:22 Joo Hyuk Kim wrote:
> Hi community,
>
> This PIP has received a couple of approvals in github PR link [1]
> So I thought it's time to vote.
>
> ## Motivation
>
> In the current Pulsar codebase, the logic to parse CLI arguments for
> measu
Affected versions:
- Apache Pulsar Function Worker before 2.10.4
- Apache Pulsar Function Worker 2.11.0
Description:
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache
Pulsar Function Worker.
This issue affects Apache Pulsar: before 2.10.4, and 2.11.0.
Any authenticate
Affected versions:
- Apache Pulsar before 2.9.5
- Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 through 2.10.3
- Apache Pulsar 2.11.0
Description:
Improper Authentication vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache
Pulsar Broker allows a client to stay connected to a broker after
authentication data expires if
Affected versions:
- Apache Pulsar before 2.10.4
- Apache Pulsar 2.11.0
Description:
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache
Pulsar.
This issue affects Apache Pulsar: before 2.10.4, and 2.11.0.
When a client connects to the Pulsar Function Worker via the Pul
Affected versions:
- Apache Pulsar Broker 2.9.0 through 2.9.5
- Apache Pulsar Broker 2.10.0 before 2.10.4
- Apache Pulsar Broker 2.11.0
Description:
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache
Pulsar Broker's Rest Producer allows authenticated user with a custom H
Hi community,
Thank you all for your participation.
We may close the vote with the following result.
1 of (+1 non-binding)
- Zili Chen
3 of (+1 binding)
- Yunze Xu
- Mattison (Qiang Zhao)
- Nicolò Boschi
Best regards
JooHyukKim (Vince)
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 7:04 PM Joo Hyuk Kim wr
> As long as we don't introduce any breaking change and the new parameters
> are covered by unit test
Made a commit(Link [1]) to improve considerations
Link [1]
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20691/commits/96515b85e97a56133a512165c981361fab939ec1
Thanks,
JooHyukKim (Vince)
On Tue, Jul 11
> As long as we don't introduce any breaking change and the new parameters
are covered by unit test
Hello, thank you for your feedback.
I agree and will add following to PIP file.
"The refactored parameters should maintain coverage. "
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 6:34 PM Nicolò Boschi wrote:
> +1 bi
+1 binding
As long as we don't introduce any breaking change and the new parameters
are covered by unit test
Thanks,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 11 lug 2023 alle ore 05:00 Qiang Zhao
ha scritto:
> +1(binding)
>
> Best,
> Mattison
>
> On 2023/07/07 09:25:22 Joo Hyuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi community,