Re: [VOTE] PIP-265: PR-based system for managing and reviewing PIPs

2023-05-14 Thread Max Xu
+1 (non-binding) Thanks for driving this helpful proposal! Best, Max Xu On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 6:52 PM Asaf Mesika wrote: > Hi, > > I'm starting the vote process for PIP-265. > > Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/20207 > > Thanks! > > Asaf >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-265: PR-based system for managing and reviewing PIPs

2023-05-14 Thread Hang Chen
+1 (binding) It will be helpful for PR review. Best, Hang PengHui Li 于2023年5月15日周一 10:09写道: > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Penghui > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 6:52 PM Asaf Mesika wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm starting the vote process for PIP-265. > > > > Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/

Re: [VOTE] PIP-265: PR-based system for managing and reviewing PIPs

2023-05-14 Thread PengHui Li
+1 (binding) Thanks, Penghui On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 6:52 PM Asaf Mesika wrote: > Hi, > > I'm starting the vote process for PIP-265. > > Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/20207 > > Thanks! > > Asaf >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-268: Add support of topic stats/stats-internal using client api

2023-05-14 Thread Rajan Dhabalia
There are multiple factors tcp would be better than http when you are considering performance and scale due to lower overhead, faster parsing, more control over connection, congestion control, etc and that could be reasons why we have tcp binary protocol for producers/consumers communication with s

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-264: Enhanced OTel-based metric system

2023-05-14 Thread Dave Fisher
> On May 10, 2023, at 1:01 AM, Asaf Mesika wrote: > > On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 11:29 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > >> >> On May 8, 2023, at 2:49 AM, Asaf Mesika wrote: >>> >>> Your feedback made me realized I need to add "TL;DR" section, which I >> just >>> added. >>> >>> I'm quoting it h

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-264: Enhanced OTel-based metric system

2023-05-14 Thread Asaf Mesika
Bumping, as I have received only 1 partial feedback so far on the PIP. Any feedback is highly appreciated! Thanks! Asaf On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:00 AM Asaf Mesika wrote: > > > On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 11:29 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > >> >> >> > On May 8, 2023, at 2:49 AM, Asaf Mesika wrote: >>

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-268: Add support of topic stats/stats-internal using client api

2023-05-14 Thread Asaf Mesika
If I dive into the exact details of the cause of the performance implications in current Admin HTTP API: Do you think the root cause of the performance is the Jersey implementation of `AsyncResponse.resume(stats)` which takes a thread from a thread pool, serialize the object and then performs a bl

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace stale bot with ping-pong workflow

2023-05-14 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - I have not looked at all your links but I think this is a great idea. This will help everyone pay attention better. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On May 14, 2023, at 12:33 AM, tison wrote: > > Of course, changing the workflow cannot magically increase the bandwidth to > handle stale

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace stale bot with ping-pong workflow

2023-05-14 Thread tison
Of course, changing the workflow cannot magically increase the bandwidth to handle stale issues. That is what the triage guide wants to encourage committers to practice. But such a move can reduce the frustrating experience and explicitly express who is responsible for taking the next action to nud

[DISCUSS] Replace stale bot with ping-pong workflow

2023-05-14 Thread tison
Hi devs, Recently, I have handled a large number of stale issues and noticed that periodically notifying users that "the issue is stale" without any human reaction can be a frustrating experience, e.g., ISSUE-13925[1]. Learning from the INFRA JIRA project experience, I propose we replace the stal