Re: [DISCUSS] Add checklist for PMC binding vote of PIP

2023-05-11 Thread Yunze Xu
I found I just misunderstood the "checklist" you mean. I thought it's more like a "summary" of a proposal. So I thought you wanted the reviewers to give a summary list and select which of them are understood. But why do we need a checklist? Is there any reason that any item of the list is not selec

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-267: Support multi-topic messageId deserialization to ack messages

2023-05-11 Thread Rajan Dhabalia
Thank you for sharing your knowledge about the PIP which should be created before PR and I think everyone in the community knows about it. but you can check the PR for context which was blocked for sometime and we decided to create PIP with proto changes. This PIP/PR tries to fix the issue where p

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-268: Add support of topic stats/stats-internal using client api

2023-05-11 Thread Rajan Dhabalia
Communicating over binary protocol is more scalable and performant than HTTP. Admin API over http has a long history of bottleneck and performance issues which could also sometimes be a bottleneck for lookup requests and that was the reason we introduced lookup over binary protocol as well. We have

Re: [VOTE] PIP-251 Enhancing Transaction Buffer Stats and Introducing TransactionBufferInternalStats API

2023-05-11 Thread 丛搏
+1(binding) Thanks, Bo Nicolò Boschi 于2023年5月11日周四 16:38写道: > > +1 binding > > I'm happy that we're going to improve the monitoring tools for > transactions, > which is probably the aspect that is lacking more from a user perspective > > > Nicolò Boschi > > > Il giorno mer 10 mag 2023 alle ore 1

Re: Re:Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-255: Assign topic partitions to bundle by round robin

2023-05-11 Thread Heesung Sohn
Hi, As pip-192(load balancer extension) has been added in pulsar-3.0, could you also clarify how this strategy will be compatible with the load balancer extension? >From my understanding, this partition assignment strategy can also be configurable in the load balancer extension. Can you confirm?

Re: [VOTE] PIP-270 Add config to set metadata size threshold for compression

2023-05-11 Thread Asaf Mesika
30 minutes is not enough time to read a pip :) On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 19:04 lifepuzzlefun wrote: > Hello Pulsar community, > > This thread is to start a PIP-270 Add config to set metadata size > threshold for compression > > > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6930c74m31rflr

Re: [VOTE] PIP-270 Add config to set metadata size threshold for compression

2023-05-11 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hello lifepuzzlefun, thanks for your proposal I believe that it is too early to start a VOTE as the discussion has not happened yet. Side note: this change is small and it doesn't introduce breaking API changes, I am not sure that we need a PIP for it. Enrico Il giorno gio 11 mag 2023 alle ore

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-270 Add config to set metadata size threshold for compression.

2023-05-11 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Makes sense to me. Thanks for your contribution Enrico Il giorno gio 11 mag 2023 alle ore 18:01 lifepuzzlefun ha scritto: > > Dear Pulsar community, > > > I create a pip aim to add configuration on size based metadata compresssion. > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/20307 > > > We wel

[VOTE] PIP-270 Add config to set metadata size threshold for compression

2023-05-11 Thread lifepuzzlefun
Hello Pulsar community, This thread is to start a PIP-270 Add config to set metadata size threshold for compression Discussion thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/6930c74m31rflrql9y3dpjmm0sbccqkb Issue: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/20307 Voting will be open for at least 48 hou

[DISCUSS] PIP-270 Add config to set metadata size threshold for compression.

2023-05-11 Thread lifepuzzlefun
Dear Pulsar community, I create a pip aim to add configuration on size based metadata compresssion. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/20307 We welcome your feedback and suggestions on this proposal.

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-267: Support multi-topic messageId deserialization to ack messages

2023-05-11 Thread Asaf Mesika
Hi Rajan, A few comments on the PIP as I couldn't understand it fully as some pieces of information is missing. First, I would like to remind about the rules, that exists in the beginning of the PIP template: In this specific case 1. I would include explanation and detail the data structures

CFP: OSPP 2023 contributor applications open!

2023-05-11 Thread Yu
Hi team, Contributor applications for Open Source Promotion (OSPP) 2023 [1] are now open! Open-source beginners or anyone interested in Pulsar are welcome to apply from now until **June 3 15:00 UTC+8**. This year we have a new project called *Optimizing the Findability of Pulsar Documentation wi

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-268: Add support of topic stats/stats-internal using client api

2023-05-11 Thread Asaf Mesika
Before I dive into the PIP, I have several questions on the background provided below: On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 9:08 AM Rajan Dhabalia wrote: > Hi, > > Right now, Pulsar provides the topic's stats and stats-internal over HTTP > admin API, and this stats data is used by user applications and also

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client C++ Release 3.2.0 Candidate 3

2023-05-11 Thread Nozomi Kurihara
+1 (binding) - verified signature and checksum - built from source codes on CentOS Linux 7 - ran producer and consumer on CentOS Linux 7 Thanks, Nozomi

Re: [VOTE] PIP-251 Enhancing Transaction Buffer Stats and Introducing TransactionBufferInternalStats API

2023-05-11 Thread Nicolò Boschi
+1 binding I'm happy that we're going to improve the monitoring tools for transactions, which is probably the aspect that is lacking more from a user perspective Nicolò Boschi Il giorno mer 10 mag 2023 alle ore 10:58 Xiangying Meng < xiangy...@apache.org> ha scritto: > Hello Pulsar community,