Thank you for bringing up this important topic. I completely agree with
this initiative.
This would be a great starting point for revisiting and improving the
Pulsar codebase.
Thanks,
Xiangying
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 2:18 PM Lin Lin wrote:
> This is a good idea.
>
> Thanks,
> Lin Lin
>
> On 20
This is a good idea.
Thanks,
Lin Lin
On 2023/04/18 02:07:55 mattisonc...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hello, folks.
>
> I would like to start discussing the pulsar internal thread pool sorting out.
>
> How did I get this idea?
>
> Recently, we met some problems with the BK operation timeout. After
Basically I think describing how much work the reviewer did to give
his +1 is good. Just like the vote for a release, each +1 follows with
the verifications he did, e.g. here [1] is a vote for Pulsar 2.11.1
candidate 1:
> • Built from the source package (maven 3.8.6 OpenJDK 17.0)
> • Ran binary pa
I agree with this improvement. I had the same idea before but it would
take too much time so I didn't continue at that time.
Thanks,
Yunze
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:08 AM wrote:
>
>
> Hello, folks.
>
> I would like to start discussing the pulsar internal thread pool sorting out.
>
> How did I g
I have pushed out a PR to revert this change first.
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20123
Please help review.
Thanks,
Penghui
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 11:36 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> > Flink uses the schema to store some kv based properties. If we can
> expose all the operations of the topi
> Flink uses the schema to store some kv based properties. If we can
expose all the operations of the topic level metadata store. We can
truly drop the use of uploading the BYTES schema in the Flink
connector.
After 3.0.0, Pulsar will provide the ability to set properties for a topic
https://githu
Ah, yes, it works after setting `PULSAR_STANDALONE_USE_ZOOKEEPER=1`
We need to push a PR to fix the validation document.
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Penghui
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:14 PM Haiting Jiang
wrote:
> Hi Penghui
>
> Did you set `PULSAR_STANDALONE_USE_ZOOKEEPER=1` when verifying
> Stateful
+1 (binding)
- Check the signature
- Build from the source package
- Start the standalone
- Validate Pub/Sub and Java Functions
- Validate Stateful Functions
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 8:52 PM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Checked the signature
> - Build from th
Hello, folks.
I would like to start discussing the pulsar internal thread pool sorting out.
How did I get this idea?
Recently, we met some problems with the BK operation timeout. After
investigating, we found an issue that is we share the IO executor(workgroup)
with the Bookkeeper client and
>I support reverting the PR first and then looking for a long-term solution.
Flink uses the schema to store some kv based properties. If we can
expose all the operations of the topic level metadata store. We can
truly drop the use of uploading the BYTES schema in the Flink
connector.
On Mon, Apr
+1 (non-binding)
* verify checksum and signatures
* build the source
* run producer, consumer, consumer_listener (source/npm)
Regards,
Yuto Furuta
差出人: Baodi Shi
送信日時: 2023年4月14日 18:12
宛先: dev@pulsar.apache.org
件名: [VOTE] Pulsar Node.js Client Release 1.8.2 Can
+1 (binding)
- verified checksum and signature
- confirmed that the build was successful
- ran produce/consume
Regards,
Masahiro Sakamoto
Yahoo Japan Corp.
E-mail: massa...@yahoo-corp.jp
-Original Message-
From: Baodi Shi
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 6:12 PM
To: dev@pulsar.apache.org
S
Hi Penghui
Did you set `PULSAR_STANDALONE_USE_ZOOKEEPER=1` when verifying
Stateful Functions ?
Thanks,
Haiting
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 7:48 PM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> The RC version failed to verify the state function
>
> The output:
>
> ```
> ~/Downloads/release_2.11.1/apache-pulsar-2.11.1 » bin
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature
- Build from the source package
- Start standalone
- Checked cassandra connector
- Checked state function
Regards,
Penghui
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 6:08 PM wrote:
> +1 (Binding)
>
> • Built from the source package (maven 3.8.6 OpenJDK 11.0)
> • Ran binary
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature
- Build from the source package
- Start standalone
- Checked cassandra connector
- Checked state function
Regards,
Penghui
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 5:37 PM wrote:
> +1 (Binding)
>
> • Built from the source package (maven 3.8.6 OpenJDK 11)
> • Ran binary pa
The RC version failed to verify the state function
The output:
```
~/Downloads/release_2.11.1/apache-pulsar-2.11.1 » bin/pulsar-admin
functions status --tenant test --namespace test-namespace --name word_count
{
"numInstances" : 1,
"numRunning" : 1,
"instances" : [ {
"instanceId" : 0,
Hi Penghui,
I appreciate your feedback and completely agree with your concern about the
learning curve for Pulsar users. Introducing additional keywords could
potentially increase the complexity for users who need to understand the
new terms. Therefore, I accept your suggestion to use delete-all-n
I don't think it will bring more burden on reviewers.
It will only provide a checklist for reviewers before
you vote +1 or -1. It could be done in 1 minute if you
did a great proposal review. Of course, if you are
missing some aspects that should be reviewed,
This will make the reviewer spend more
The new operation will delete all the data and the metadata under
a tenant or namespace. I would like to suggest to use
`delete-all-namespaces` and `delete-all-topics`
The `delete` actually acts as a fact of deleting metadata and data.
And `truncate` is for deleting the data. IMO, we'd better not
19 matches
Mail list logo
