Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Node.js Client Release 1.8.2 Candidate 1

2023-04-10 Thread Yunze Xu
+1 (binding) * Checked signatures and checksums * Build from source and run e2e examples (Ubuntu 20.04 and Node.js v16.19.0) * Install from NPM and run e2e examples with OAuth2 authentication through StreamNative cloud (Ubuntu 20.04 and Node.js v16.19.0, node:19-bullseye container) Thanks, Yunze

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-250: Add proxyVersion to CommandConnect

2023-04-10 Thread Michael Marshall
Thanks for your feedback Mattison and Xiangying. I'll note that the PIP vote did close already and I have the implementation just about done, but I'm happy to discuss this feature a bit more here. > we should avoid coupling the concepts in the proxy and the broker Sharing version information does

Call for projects and mentors for OSPP 2023

2023-04-10 Thread Dianjin Wang
Hi all, Glad to share that Apache Pulsar is listed at the OSPP 2023 again. This year, the Pulsar community can open 7 projects at most. For OSPP 2023, the project idea will be open from 4/04, 2023 to 04/28, 2023(UTC+8). If you have great ideas, please reply to this email by following the project

Re: [DISCUSS] Dropping the StreamingDispatcher

2023-04-10 Thread Christophe Bornet
Shouldn't it first be deprecated before removal ? Le mar. 4 avr. 2023 à 08:47, Enrico Olivelli a écrit : > > Hello, > It has been a long time that we have in the Pulsar code a new > experimental Dispatcher implementation named StreamingDispatcher. > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/9056 >

Re: [Discuss] Add a phase to process pending PRs before code freeze

2023-04-10 Thread Christophe Bornet
Hi Yunze, Thanks for bringing this discussion. I agree that there must be some step to remind everybody that a code freeze is coming and that people should pay attention to their open PRs if they want them included. In a sense Zike's mail one week ago did this and was pretty clear on what was goin

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-255: Assign topic partitions to bundle by round robin

2023-04-10 Thread PengHui Li
Hi Lin, > The load managed by each Bundle is not even. Even if the number of partitions managed by each bundle is the same, there is no guarantee that the sum of the loads of these partitions will be the same. Do we expect that the bundles should have the same loads? The bundle is the base

Re: [Discuss] Add a phase to process pending PRs before code freeze

2023-04-10 Thread Zike Yang
Hi, Yunze, Thanks for raising this discussion. It's good to have the phase to proceed with the PR reviewing and merging before the code freeze. > But the release managers should address the PRs actively. > They can help review the PRs. Or at least, I think we should separate these two roles: Rel

Re: [Discuss] Add a phase to process pending PRs before code freeze

2023-04-10 Thread Xiangying Meng
Hi Yunze, Thank you for bringing up this critical issue regarding pending PRs before the code freeze. I appreciate your thoughtful insights and suggestions. I'd like to share my thoughts on this. In previous releases, we didn't have a formal code freeze announcement; instead, we had a discussion

[VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.5 Candidate 3

2023-04-10 Thread Cong Zhao
This is the third release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version 2.9.5. This release contains 105 commits by 32 contributors. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/compare/v2.9.4...v2.9.5-candidate-3 *** Please download, test, and vote on this release. This vote will stay open for at least 72 hours ***