Hi Yubiao,
Appreciate your effort in initiating this PIP. I believe these changes will
address the existing issues and make DLQ and Retry Topic handling more
efficient and straightforward.
The goals you outlined are clear and, upon implementation, will improve the
overall functionality of Pulsar.
Thanks for initiating the proposal, Michael.
I strongly support this addition, which will greatly enhance Pulsar's
security and reliability.
> I am new to this security component, but how do we support token revoke?
Regarding Heesung Sohn's question about token revocation,
I believe that we can ini
Hi all,
+1 for removing the StreamingDispatcher in Pulsar 3.0. Balancing
maintainability, scalability, and usability is critical for an open-source
project. In this case, the StreamingDispatcher seems to be neither widely
adopted nor actively maintained, and its code quality and unstable tests
hav
+1, I support removing it if the code isn't being used or maintained.
Thanks,
Cong Zhao
On 2023/04/04 06:47:24 Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Hello,
> It has been a long time that we have in the Pulsar code a new
> experimental Dispatcher implementation named StreamingDispatcher.
>
> https://github.co
+1 for the reason that it was added when there is no PIP restriction
for new APIs. The original author has left the community for some time
and recently it seems that no one touched the code except for some
necessary API changes.
Thanks,
Yunze
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 11:48 AM wrote:
>
> Totally a
