Yes, Thanks Tison and Yubiao. Close this vote.
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 12:32 PM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
>
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> The PR 19989[1] fixes an issue that non-super role users cannot access the
> tenant's API event if disabled authorization. We should wait for this P
I see that the 2.9.5 tag was pushed [0]. How do we handle that situation?
Thanks,
Michael
[0] https://lists.apache.org/thread/rqojf378x9j8p58h0q8zvxg31fo07gn4
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 11:35 PM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
>
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> - The PR 19989[1] fixes an issue that non-super role users c
-1 (non-binding)
- The PR 19989[1] fixes an issue that non-super role users cannot access
the tenant's API event if disabled authorization. We should wait for this
PR merge,
Thanks
Yubiao Feng
[1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19989
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 11:09 PM Cong Zhao wrote:
>
-1 (non-binding)
- The PR 19989[1] fixes an issue that non-super role users cannot access
the tenant's API event if disabled authorization. We should wait for this
PR merge,
- The PR 19971[2] fixes the un-forward-compatibility config
`saslJaasServerRoleTokenSignerSecretPath`. We should wait for th
-1 (non-binding)
The PR 19989[1] fixes an issue that non-super role users cannot access the
tenant's API event if disabled authorization. We should wait for this PR
merge,
Thanks
Yubiao Feng
[1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19989
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 4:52 PM guo jiwei wrote:
> Thi
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Michael
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 3:51 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno mer 29 mar 2023 alle ore 09:16 丛搏 ha scritto:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bo
> >
> > Lin Lin 于2023年3月27日周一 17:49写道：
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> >
+1
I support having the high-level discussion on the ML, but I can see
that becoming confusing if there are multiple places to discuss the
PIP. In my view, GitHub is great when you want to discuss specific
lines in a PR, but general discussion on the PR's main page is
essentially the same as a mai
Thank you for verifying this release. Closing the vote:
3 binding +1s:
* Nozomi Kurihara
* Yunze Xu
* Mattison
2 non-binding +1s:
* Baodi Shi
* Takeshi Kimura
BR,
Zike Yang
On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 8:43 PM wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> • Built the project
> • Ran the simple producer & consumer wit
+1 (binding)
- Start standalone
- Use pulsar-perf to produce and consume
- Function and state function works
- Cassandra connector works
Regards,
Penghui
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 10:57 PM wrote:
> +1 (Binding)
>
> • Built from the source package (maven 3.8.6 OpenJDK 11.0)
> • Ran binary package
+1 (Binding)
• Built from the source package (maven 3.8.6 OpenJDK 11.0)
• Ran binary package standalone with pub/sub
• Ran docker image(pulsar-all) standalone with pub/sub
• Ran License check
Best,
Mattison
On Mar 27, 2023, 18:58 +0800, 丛搏 , wrote:
> +1(binding)
>
> Please ignore the previous r
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 2, 2023, at 7:35 AM, Asaf Mesika wrote:
>
> Summarizing so far:
>
> Non-binding: Girish Sharma, Nitin Goyal
> Binding: Christophe Bornet, Penghui Li, Jun Ma, Yu Liu, Lari
>
> Questions:
> 1. Girish - Why do we need to keep the voting in the mailng list?
>
> Si
+1 (Binding)
• Built from the source package (maven 3.8.6 OpenJDK 11.0)
• Ran binary package standalone with pub/sub
• Ran docker image(pulsar-all) standalone with pub/sub
• Ran License check
Best,
Mattison
On Mar 28, 2023, 22:23 +0800, guo jiwei , wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Checked the signatu
Summarizing so far:
Non-binding: Girish Sharma, Nitin Goyal
Binding: Christophe Bornet, Penghui Li, Jun Ma, Yu Liu, Lari
Questions:
1. Girish - Why do we need to keep the voting in the mailng list?
Since it’s mandatory by ASF.
Also, I prefer to change the process step by step. This is a big chan
13 matches
Mail list logo
