Hi Asaf,
If we fail the client when users use Durable subscription to subscribe
NonPersistentTopic, it will lead to break change.
Users have to change their code, so we can change the `subscriptionMode` from
`Durable` to `NonDurable` and print WARN log when users choose `Durable`, then,
users
+1 (non-binding)
- Build from source (macos x86_64 12.6)
- Run example producer/consumer
- Run perf producer/consumer.
- Run unit tests
I have found an issue when running the unit test [0]. But it seems not
a regression bug and only affects the test code. So I am +1.
[0] https://github.com/apach
+1 (binding)
Enrico
Il Mar 14 Feb 2023, 07:51 ha scritto:
> +1(non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Mattison
> On Feb 9, 2023, 04:44 +0800, Matteo Merli , wrote:
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15966
> >
> >
> -
+1(non-binding)
Best,
Mattison
On Feb 9, 2023, 04:44 +0800, Matteo Merli , wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15966
>
>
>
>
> ## Motivation
>
> In PIP-47 (
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki
+1 (binding)
Thanks for bringing this thread back, Matteo.
Thanks,
Michael
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 9:20 PM Hang Chen wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Hang
>
> Haiting Jiang 于2023年2月14日周二 10:27写道：
> >
> > Hi Matteo,
> >
> > I noticed that 2.10 is not mentioned to be the first LTS version a
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Hang
Haiting Jiang 于2023年2月14日周二 10:27写道：
>
> Hi Matteo,
>
> I noticed that 2.10 is not mentioned to be the first LTS version as
> discussed previously.
> Should we include this?
>
> Thanks,
> Haiting
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:26 AM Yunze Xu
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (bindi
Ping Michael.
Zixuan Liu 于2022年12月26日周一 11:07写道：
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thank you for your suggestion!
>
> OIDC is very popular everywhere and makes great sense for Apache Pulsar.
> Your OIDC plugin is excellent, it follows the OIDC standard and includes my
> PIP idea. I'm looking forward to your OI
Hi Matteo,
I noticed that 2.10 is not mentioned to be the first LTS version as
discussed previously.
Should we include this?
Thanks,
Haiting
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:26 AM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 6:47 PM Nicolò Boschi wrote:
> >
> > +1
+1 binding
Thanks
Haiting
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:27 AM 丛搏 wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Bo
>
> 易客 萧 于2023年2月13日周一 09:51写道：
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > From: Yubiao Feng
> > Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2023 20:04
> > To: dev@pulsar.apache.org
>
Hi, Asaf
Welcome to join this discussion.
> You mean that allows the *system* to use it when it's a partitioned topic?
Sorry, I didn't get your point. What do you mean by *system*?
> Why postfix of `__`?Why uppercase ?Maybe `__system__`?
Yes, That is a key point that I want to discuss in this thre
Hi dev,
If there are no particular concerns, I will send out a vote email.
Thanks,
Heesung
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:28 AM Heesung Sohn
wrote:
> Hi Pulsar dev,
>
> I raised a PIP for the default config change(change the
> aggregatePublisherStatsByProducerName config default to true) as
> reque
Hi -,
Anyone interested in Apache jClouds which Pulsar uses for Offloading / Tiered
Storage should probably be aware that the project is thinking about moving to
the Attic stoping active development.
Anyone interested in jClouds continuing should subscribe to
d...@jclouds.apache.org and ask ho
Clarifying: as Pengu wrote in the pip comment - if we change the default
subscription mode to be non-durable for non-persistent topics, then what
will happen to users who previously had durable subscriptions on that
topic? Are we ruining something if we create non-durable subscriptions
instead?
O
I made a small comment on the PIP just now.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 8:56 AM Jiuming Tao
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start a VOTE on `PIP-245: Make subscriptions of
> non-persistent topic non-durable`.
>
> Motivation:
>
> There are two types of subscriptions for a topic: Durable and Non
Can we fail the client if they choose NonDurable subscription mode on a
non-persistent topic, instead of writing WARN log messages?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 4:26 AM guo jiwei wrote:
> Agree，+1
>
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 7:07 PM Jiuming Tao
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I
Sounds like a bug for sure.
How did you plan on solving it?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 12:46 AM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Il Dom 12 Feb 2023, 04:42 Yubiao Feng .invalid>
> ha scritto:
>
> > Hi Enrico Olivelli
> >
> > > It is good to help users to not fall into bad situations but on the
> other
> >
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 6:01 AM wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> This is the refined PIP-242 discussion thread. Because we have discussed
> some parts of this in another thread[0][1], we can start the standard PIP
> discussion to reach a detailed consensus.
>
> You can check here[2] to see the PIP.
>
>
> Be
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 12:02 PM Yan Zhao wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/02/05 14:40:10 Asaf Mesika wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 1:48 PM Yan Zhao wrote:
> >
> > > > If you persisted the message successfully by the producer and the
> broker
> > > > was terminated before being able to delete the ledger
18 matches
Mail list logo
