Re: [DISCUSS] forbid user to upload `BYTES` schema

2022-12-12 Thread Xiangying Meng
Hi, Donglai: Thanks for your discussion. I think we should think about why we can not add a new schema of BYTES. The users use the byte schema to send or consume messages. But the schema registry has never stored the BYTES schema and we always need some special compatibility checks for the BYTES sc

Re: [DISCUSS] forbid user to upload `BYTES` schema

2022-12-12 Thread Baodi Shi
Hi, Donglai: Thanks for your discussion. I have a question: After the user uploads the `BYTES` schema, will users using other schemas to connect to the topic do compatibility checks? Thanks, Baodi Shi > 2022年12月13日 12:43,丛搏 写道: > > Hi, Donglai: > > I agree to forbid users to upload `BYTES`.

Re: [DISCUSS] forbid user to upload `BYTES` schema

2022-12-12 Thread 丛搏
Hi, Donglai: I agree to forbid users to upload `BYTES`. Otherwise, It will cause inconsistent behavior with the pulsar client. Users uploading bytes schema does not have any effect, on the contrary, it will bring a lot of confusion to users. Thanks, bo labuladong 于2022年12月9日周五 18:57写道: > > Hi p

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.4 Candidate 2

2022-12-12 Thread 丛搏
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/18812 This pr is a regression for branch-2.9, so I close 2.9.4 Candidate 2 and will create a new Candidate 3. Please don't validate this candidate. 丛搏 于2022年12月11日周日 15:10写道: > > This is the second release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version 2.9.4. > > This

[GitHub] [pulsar] michaeljmarshall added a comment to the discussion: Enable TLS hostname verification by default

2022-12-12 Thread GitBox
GitHub user michaeljmarshall added a comment to the discussion: Enable TLS hostname verification by default This issue is still relevant. I have wanted to submit a PIP to do this, and to make sure that all configuration names for hostname verification are the same, but I haven't had a chance.

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.11.0 Candidate-2

2022-12-12 Thread guo jiwei
Hi All the issues have been resolved and cherry-picked to branch-2.11, I will trigger the RC3 release now. Thank you. Regards Tboy On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 6:04 PM Zixuan Liu wrote: > I submitted https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/18837 to fix this issue. > > Thanks, > Zixuan > > Zixua

[ANNOUNCE] Released Reactive client for Apache Pulsar, version 0.1.0

2022-12-12 Thread Lari Hotari
The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce the Reactive client for Apache Pulsar, version 0.1.0. The Reactive client for Apache Pulsar can be used together with any Reactive Streams implementation on the JVM. Examples include Project Reactor / Spring Reactive, Akka Streams, RxJava 3, Vert.x, Smal

Re: Too many emails - Is there a better way to control or manage emails from GitBox

2022-12-12 Thread Yu
Hi tison, Thanks for clearing up various issues and PRs! One quick question: For the "Discussion posts" converted from "Issues", can we set it not to sync to dev@pulsar.apache.org (since they do not have new discussions and comments)? Thank you! On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:30 AM Zili Chen wrot