Re: [DISCUSS] Decrease GitHub email notifications from apache/pulsar-* repos to this ML

+1, thank you, Michael! On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 1:00 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > +1 Thanks Michael for fixing these! > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 9:52 PM Michael Marshall > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I had a brief discussion with Matteo about mailing list notifications > > for our apache/pul

Re: [DISCUSS] Decrease GitHub email notifications from apache/pulsar-* repos to this ML

+1 Thanks Michael for fixing these! On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 9:52 PM Michael Marshall wrote: > Hi All, > > I had a brief discussion with Matteo about mailing list notifications > for our apache/pulsar-* repos in this PR > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/pull/42. Please see it for >

[DISCUSS] Decrease GitHub email notifications from apache/pulsar-* repos to this ML

Hi All, I had a brief discussion with Matteo about mailing list notifications for our apache/pulsar-* repos in this PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/pull/42. Please see it for additional context. The outcome is a proposal to make all of our GitHub repos send their notifications to c

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client C++ Release 3.0.0 Candidate 1

I am getting an error when building from the downloaded source tarball while following the instructions in the README. I get this error: $ ./docker-build.sh fatal: not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git The issue is in the script. I believe we have already solved this in th

[VOTE] Pulsar Client C++ Release 3.0.0 Candidate 1

This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar Client C++, version 3.0.0. It fixes the following issues: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/milestone/1?closed=1 *** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will stay open for at least 72 hours *** Note that we are

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning for Apache Pulsar 3.0

Agree, though let's make separate discussions. Putting all random ideas into the same cauldron is a good recipe for making no one able to follow or see a common line. That's what I meant when I started the proposal of having 3.0 completely detached from "features". If you start making a big conta

[DISCUSS] PIP-212: Default reppDnsResolverClass to ZkBookieRackAffinityMapping

Hi All, I created PIP 212: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18012. It already has a PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15640. It is a minor change that I view as more of a bug fix, but because it changes a default value, it needs a PIP. The main point for discussion is whether we can

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning for Apache Pulsar 3.0

Let’s discuss any and all ideas for improvement. As each is discussed we can figure out how to make them non-breaking, We all want Pulsar to improve. We should encourage an open discussion where no idea is automatically bad or wrong. They can just be discussed without fear. Thanks, Dave > On O

[PIP] Admin API should be able to return messages in human-readable formats.

Github issue: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/17947. Motivation Currently, pulsar-admin topics peek-messages and the REST equivalent return the message payload in their original binary form. In the case that the topic has a complex schema, for example, AVRO, protobuf-encoded binary is ret

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning for Apache Pulsar 3.0

> If you want to work on cloud-events > integration, please do. I still don't see how's that related to Pulsar > 3.0 discussion. Would a change to SchemaInfo break the client? Devin G. Bost On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:58 AM Matteo Merli wrote: > > Companies want to be cloud agnostic since it

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning for Apache Pulsar 3.0

> Companies want to be cloud agnostic since it reduces their risk, and the idea of multi-cloud integration is very attractive to companies that want the best of both worlds or need to integrate data across platforms. If Pulsar is not part of this wave, I'm concerned we will be left behind. That so

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning for Apache Pulsar 3.0

How about the gap between SchemaInfo and interoperability with CloudEvents? We're seeing a convergence between cloud providers on CloudEvents. I just learned that SAP Event Mesh now is working on integration with Azure EventGrid via

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] amareshmad commented on issue #114: When i run test console app consumer is creating and when i integrate same to actual product consumer is not creating and going to Fault

amareshmad commented on issue #114: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/114#issuecomment-1274991980 @Blankensteiner thanks for the reply. will create producer as well and verify same from product code. if framework version is the issue even it could have blocked

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] blankensteiner commented on issue #114: When i run test console app consumer is creating and when i integrate same to actual product consumer is not creating and going to F

blankensteiner commented on issue #114: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/114#issuecomment-1274853344 I suspect that DotPulsar.Exceptions.ChannelNotReadyException is not the only exception you are seeing. That exception will never fault a Producer/Consumer/Reader. I

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] amareshmad commented on issue #114: When i run test console app consumer is creating and when i integrate same to actual product consumer is not creating and going to Fault

amareshmad commented on issue #114: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/114#issuecomment-1274824931 any idea on what could be the reason to go for Consumer state to Faulted? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, plea

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] amareshmad commented on issue #114: When i run test console app consumer is creating and when i integrate same to actual product consumer is not creating and going to Fault

amareshmad commented on issue #114: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/114#issuecomment-1274735759 sample app tried in both .net framework and .net core, both sample apps are working. same code tested consoles and integrated to product. using DotPulsar; usin

[GitHub] [pulsar] D-2-Ed added a comment to the discussion: [Doc] Repurpose the Kubernetes chapter with IA improvements

GitHub user D-2-Ed added a comment to the discussion: [Doc] Repurpose the Kubernetes chapter with IA improvements @momo-jun - I agree there are many distracting categories in the left navigation. The IA calls for quickstart section and deployment section under Pulsar A-Z. Please confer with @

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] blankensteiner commented on issue #114: When i run test console app consumer is creating and when i integrate same to actual product consumer is not creating and going to F

blankensteiner commented on issue #114: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/114#issuecomment-1274712238 I get that the code is the same, but is it the same version of .NET? You mention both .NET Framework and .NET 6. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] amareshmad commented on issue #114: When i run test console app consumer is creating and when i integrate same to actual product consumer is not creating and going to Fault

amareshmad commented on issue #114: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/114#issuecomment-1274706847 > Hi @amareshmad > > Is the test project and the production project the same version of .NET? Test Project and same code is used for product code as well.

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] blankensteiner commented on issue #114: When i run test console app consumer is creating and when i integrate same to actual product consumer is not creating and going to F

blankensteiner commented on issue #114: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/114#issuecomment-1274688805 Hi @amareshmad Is the test project and the production project the same version of .NET? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respon

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] amareshmad opened a new issue, #114: When i run test console app consumer is creating and when i integrate same to actual product consumer is not creating and going to Faul

amareshmad opened a new issue, #114: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/114 **When I create .NET framework/.net core console app, I could be able to create a client and able to create consumer and receiving the messages as well but when I integrate it into my actual proj

[GitHub] [pulsar] amareshmad edited a discussion: Dot Pulsar consumer Issue :DotPulsar.Exceptions.ChannelNotReadyException: The channnel is not ready yet

GitHub user amareshmad edited a discussion: Dot Pulsar consumer Issue :DotPulsar.Exceptions.ChannelNotReadyException: The channnel is not ready yet **When I create .NET framework/.net core console app, I could be able to create a client and able to create consumer and receiving the messages as

[GitHub] [pulsar] amareshmad edited a discussion: Dot Pulsar consumer Issue :DotPulsar.Exceptions.ChannelNotReadyException: The channnel is not ready yet

GitHub user amareshmad edited a discussion: Dot Pulsar consumer Issue :DotPulsar.Exceptions.ChannelNotReadyException: The channnel is not ready yet **When I create .NET framework/.net core console app, I could be able to create a client and able to create consumer and receiving the messages as

[GitHub] [pulsar] amareshmad edited a discussion: Dot Pulsar consumer Issue :DotPulsar.Exceptions.ChannelNotReadyException: The channnel is not ready yet

GitHub user amareshmad edited a discussion: Dot Pulsar consumer Issue :DotPulsar.Exceptions.ChannelNotReadyException: The channnel is not ready yet **When I create .NET framework/.net core console app, I could be able to create a client and able to create consumer and receiving the messages as

[GitHub] [pulsar] amareshmad added a comment to the discussion: Dot Pulsar consumer Issue :DotPulsar.Exceptions.ChannelNotReadyException: The channnel is not ready yet

GitHub user amareshmad added a comment to the discussion: Dot Pulsar consumer Issue :DotPulsar.Exceptions.ChannelNotReadyException: The channnel is not ready yet what could be the issue, when test app is working expected product code also same. but is not happening. always gives Exceptions.Ch

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] blankensteiner merged pull request #113: .editorconfig, DotPulsar.sln.DotSettings and removed folder

blankensteiner merged PR #113: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/pull/113 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@

[GitHub] [pulsar] tisonkun added a comment to the discussion: [Design] Pulsar All Releases Page

GitHub user tisonkun added a comment to the discussion: [Design] Pulsar All Releases Page Yes. The page is online now. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/17310#discussioncomment-3848476 This is an automatically sent email for dev@pulsar.apache.org. To unsubscribe,

[GitHub] [pulsar] Anonymitaet added a comment to the discussion: [Design] Pulsar All Releases Page

GitHub user Anonymitaet added a comment to the discussion: [Design] Pulsar All Releases Page > @Anonymitaet FYI - The [release blog for > 2.10.0](https://pulsar.apache.org/blog/2022/05/11/whats-new-in-pulsar-210) is > in place but has not been shown on this new page yet. @SignorMercurio is t

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] entvex opened a new pull request, #113: .editorconfig, DotPulsar.sln.DotSettings and removed folder

entvex opened a new pull request, #113: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/pull/113 Updated .editorconfig to make ReSharper, Rider and VS2022 to use the same code style. DotPulsar.sln.DotSettings updated so the Code cleanup profiles in ReSharper and Rider have the same b

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] VisualBean commented on issue #101: `AuthenticateUsingToken(Func> tokenFactory)` is not a part of 2.3.0

VisualBean commented on issue #101: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/101#issuecomment-1274292182 Sorry, i got really busy with the release of our product. I believe the problem was simply a stale nuget cache. On Sat, 2 Apr 2022 at 13.07, Daniel Blankenstei

[GitHub] [pulsar] BewareMyPower added a comment to the discussion: Python 3.6 client for aarch64/arm64 Linux?

GitHub user BewareMyPower added a comment to the discussion: Python 3.6 client for aarch64/arm64 Linux? I'm not sure if it's a bug for ARM arch with Python 3.6, you could try building the `_pulsar.so` in a x86 arch Linux with Python 3.6 and test with `python3 -m 'import _pulsar'`. Regarding

[GitHub] [pulsar] swjz added a comment to the discussion: Python 3.6 client for aarch64/arm64 Linux?

GitHub user swjz added a comment to the discussion: Python 3.6 client for aarch64/arm64 Linux? ``` nano@nano3:~/pulsar/pulsar-client-cpp/python$ python3 -c 'import _pulsar' Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ImportError: dynamic module does not define module export functi

[GitHub] [pulsar] BewareMyPower added a comment to the discussion: Python 3.6 client for aarch64/arm64 Linux?

GitHub user BewareMyPower added a comment to the discussion: Python 3.6 client for aarch64/arm64 Linux? Could you go to the directory of `_pulsar.so` and run the following commands? ```bash python3 -c 'import _pulsar' ldd _pulsar.so ``` GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussio

[GitHub] [pulsar] swjz edited a comment on the discussion: Python 3.6 client for aarch64/arm64 Linux?

GitHub user swjz edited a comment on the discussion: Python 3.6 client for aarch64/arm64 Linux? Thanks for your quick reply! I followed the doc here (https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/client-libraries-cpp/#compilation) and used the latest release version (`git checkout v2.10.1`). That version wa

[GitHub] [pulsar] swjz edited a comment on the discussion: Python 3.6 client for aarch64/arm64 Linux?

GitHub user swjz edited a comment on the discussion: Python 3.6 client for aarch64/arm64 Linux? Thanks for your quick reply! I followed the doc here (https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/client-libraries-cpp/#compilation) and used the latest release version (`git checkout v2.10.1`). That version wa

[GitHub] [pulsar] swjz added a comment to the discussion: Python 3.6 client for aarch64/arm64 Linux?

GitHub user swjz added a comment to the discussion: Python 3.6 client for aarch64/arm64 Linux? Thanks for your quick reply! I followed the doc here (https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/client-libraries-cpp/#compilation) and used the latest release version (`git checkout v2.10.1`). That version was