Hi Pulsar Community,
In Pulsar 2.5.0, the semantics for a message's redeliveryCount changed
at the request of this issue [0]. Please see the issue for relevant
context.
In summary, the issue is whether a message that is neither positively
nor negatively acknowledged should get counted as "redeliv
Hi all,
Pulsar has a backlog quota policy `producer_request_hold` which will hold
the message
publish request. It is very useful for some data sync scenarios. It looks
like the producer
waiting for the consumer to process the data.
But the new producer is not allowed to connect to the topic after
+1
Thanks,
Zixuan
Anon Hxy 于2022年8月11日周四 10:26写道：
> +1
> Good idea. We are on the way making CI more robust
>
> Thanks,
> Xiaoyu Hou
>
> PengHui Li 于2022年8月10日周三 16:35写道：
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For better tracking flaky test fix, I have tried to create a Github
> > Project under the Pulsar repo
GitHub user nlu90 added a comment to the discussion: How do you develop
connectors in the repo workspace?
Some thoughts:
1. update the `functions_worker.yml`'s `connectorsDirectory` to point to your
dev directory
2. create a soft link to your directory
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/
+1
Good idea. We are on the way making CI more robust
Thanks,
Xiaoyu Hou
PengHui Li 于2022年8月10日周三 16:35写道：
> Hi all,
>
> For better tracking flaky test fix, I have tried to create a Github
> Project under the Pulsar repo https://github.com/apache/pulsar/projects/11
> (It can be removed if we do
Great suggestion, +1.
- Michael
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 8:38 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Yes, please!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Aug 10, 2022, at 5:39 PM, PengHui Li wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Best,
> > Penghui
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:52 PM Yunze Xu
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> LGTM
>
Yes, please!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 10, 2022, at 5:39 PM, PengHui Li wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Best,
> Penghui
>
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:52 PM Yunze Xu
>> wrote:
>>
>> LGTM
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yunze
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> 2022年8月10日 15:36，Zike Yang 写道：
>>>
>>> Hi, Pulsar community
>>>
>>
+1
Best,
Penghui
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:52 PM Yunze Xu
wrote:
> LGTM
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
>
>
>
> > 2022年8月10日 15:36，Zike Yang 写道：
> >
> > Hi, Pulsar community
> >
> > Currently, Java tests consume significant CI resources. And it is not
> > necessary to run all the tests for changes that
tr-fteixeira commented on issue #481:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/481#issuecomment-1211273398
I was able to work around the problem doing the following changes on
`build.gradle` and rebuilding the image.
I am sure this is not the best way to solve it, but it work
tr-fteixeira opened a new issue, #481:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/481
When using oauth2 for the pulsar admin broker communication, this error is
seen:
```
2022-08-01, 20:15:26.129 ERROR 17
JE[pool-2-thread-1]o.a.p.m.s.impl.ClustersServiceImpl
: Failed
GitHub user Shalima added a comment to the discussion: Test / Experiment
Batching locally
Thank you so much for the response.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/17027#discussioncomment-3368443
This is an automatically sent email for dev@pulsar.apache.org.
To uns
GitHub user Shalima added a comment to the discussion: Test / Experiment
Batching locally
I tied sendAsync, enableBatching=true, batchingMaxMessages=5,
batchingMaxPublishDelay=5 seconds. With this configuration, I sent 2 messages.
My expectation was that it will have a delay in the consumer s
+1 Great idea!
Thanks,
Michael
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 9:52 AM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> +1. Though the image url is broken :(
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
>
>
>
> > 2022年8月10日 16:35，PengHui Li 写道：
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For better tracking flaky test fix, I have tried to create a Github Project
> > under
GitHub user asafm added a comment to the discussion: How do you develop
connectors in the repo workspace?
@nlu90 might know?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/16886#discussioncomment-3367586
This is an automatically sent email for dev@pulsar.apache.org.
To unsubs
I found the scripts to build rpm and deb packages are broken, see
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Release-process#31-build-rpm-and-deb-packages.
It's caused by https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15376 and only
affects the 2.11.0 release and higher versions. It should be a blocker
for 2.11
LGTM
Thanks,
Yunze
> 2022年8月10日 15:36，Zike Yang 写道：
>
> Hi, Pulsar community
>
> Currently, Java tests consume significant CI resources. And it is not
> necessary to run all the tests for changes that are only on the C++ or
> python parts of the code. I have created a PR [0] to improve the
+1. Though the image url is broken :(
Thanks,
Yunze
> 2022年8月10日 16:35，PengHui Li 写道：
>
> Hi all,
>
> For better tracking flaky test fix, I have tried to create a Github Project
> under the Pulsar repo https://github.com/apache/pulsar/projects/11 (It can be
> removed if we don't like this
Hi team,
This is a continued thread from the last one.
Feel free to vote and comment on this issue, thank you!
Vote:
For PR titles, which convention should we follow?
- Angular convention [1]
- Our customized convention (it's customized based on Angular) [2]
Hi team,
Thanks for all your suggestions!
I'll move PIP 198 forward since we get 3 binding votes (Penghui, Lari,
Michael).
For the implementation details, I've got many different suggestions, which
can be summarized into 2 major issues:
- Issue 1: which convention should we follow?
Angular [1]
Hi Lari,
Thanks for your suggestions! Please see my replies inline.
> Would it be possible to improve the proposal in a way that the valid
prefixes for type and component are in a file in the repository and the
possible checker would use this file as the source of truth?
Yes, it's the same as we
Hi tison,
Thanks for your suggestions!
> Currently, I'd suggest: feature -> feat workflow -> ci improve/cleanup ->
> chore...
I agree on some and will send votes step by step to let the community decide.
On 2022/08/09 09:21:54 tison wrote:
> Hi Yu,
>
> To be clear, the candidates of types an
Hi tison,
Thanks for your suggestions!
> Although, we should later move the standard to our website where the whole
> project can easily contribute to ...
Sure. I'll move the [Guide] Pulsar Pull Request Naming Convention [1] to a
public place where everyone can contribute after we finalize th
This may be a matter of personal opinion but I don't see connectors as more
self contained than functions.
The problem I see in looking at this from a Function point of view is that
a Function could have both its Sink and Source not connected to Pulsar
which feels awkward. I understand that functio
That is a good way to track flaky test fix
+1
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 4:35 PM PengHui Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For better tracking flaky test fix, I have tried to create a Github
> Project under the Pulsar repo https://github.com/apache/pulsar/projects/11
> (It can be removed if we don't like th
Hi all,
For better tracking flaky test fix, I have tried to create a Github Project
under the Pulsar repo https://github.com/apache/pulsar/projects/11 (It can
be removed if we don't like this way)
This will help us to have a more intuitive view of all the flaky tests, how
many are in progress, in
Hi, Pulsar community
Currently, Java tests consume significant CI resources. And it is not
necessary to run all the tests for changes that are only on the C++ or
python parts of the code. I have created a PR [0] to improve the CI by
skipping unnecessary tests when there are only CPP/Python changes
26 matches
Mail list logo
