[Discuss] PIP-190: Simplify Pulsar documentation release and maintenance strategy

Hi, Pulsar community, Happy weekend! I'd like to open a discussion about PIP-190: Simplify Pulsar documentation release and maintenance strategy. Proposal link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16637. - ##

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Pulsar SQL to a separated repository?

Here[1] I prepare a patch to upgrade PrestoSQL dependency to Trino. If we have several PMC attentions on this part of work, no matter whether a PIP is needed, we can use the opportunity renaming presto to trino to move `conf/presto` to `trino/conf`, and `lib/presto/*` to `trino/*`. This gather al

Re: [VOTE] PIP-187 Add API to analyze a subscription backlog and provide a accurate value

+1 Penghui On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 9:41 PM Asaf Mesika wrote: > Sorry to barge in the vote - I forgot to send my reply on the discussion 2 > days ago :) > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 11:22 PM Nicolò Boschi > wrote: > > > +1, thanks > > > > Nicolò Boschi > > > > Il Mar 19 Lug 2022, 22:16 Christ

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-186: Introduce two phase deletion protocol based on system topic

Yes, wo define `twoPhaseDeletionEnabled` in the Service Configuration.

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP 193 : Sink preprocessing Function

This proposal looks good to me. > Only Functions returning a Record will be authorized to ensure that the > Function sets the Schema explicitly. Does this mean that the function return type is fixed Record? Can the interface declaration of the function be displayed in the API changes? Thanks

Re: Pulsar Flaky test report 2022-07-19 for PR builds in CI

Nice work! Thanks, Baodi Shi > On Jul 22, 2022, at 03:5833, Nicolò Boschi wrote: > > Dear community, > > Here's a report of the flaky tests in Pulsar CI during the observation > period of 2022-07-12 - 2022-07-19 > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/165FHpHjs5fHccSsmQM4beeg6brn-zfUjcrXf6

[GitHub] [pulsar-test-infra] SignorMercurio opened a new pull request, #55: Add copy of Mattraks/delete-workflow-runs@a6457c4 action

SignorMercurio opened a new pull request, #55: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/55 ### Motivation Because of security restrictions, public actions cannot be used directly in ASF GitHub Action workflows. The options are either whitelisting the action's reposit

[GitHub] [pulsar-site] SignorMercurio commented on pull request #147: Generate config docs from source code

SignorMercurio commented on PR #147: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/147#issuecomment-1192453755 @urfreespace I've reverted doc changes and this PR is ready for review now. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.11.0 Release

+1 Thanks, Zixuan Enrico Olivelli 于2022年7月22日周五 18:06写道： > Il giorno ven 22 lug 2022 alle ore 12:05 guo jiwei > ha scritto: > > > > I will take the release > > Thanks ! > > Enrico > > > > > Regards > > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 12:37 AM Nicolò Boschi > wrote: > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.11.0 Release

Il giorno ven 22 lug 2022 alle ore 12:05 guo jiwei ha scritto: > > I will take the release Thanks ! Enrico > > Regards > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 12:37 AM Nicolò Boschi wrote: > > > I understand the need for the Pulsar Summit. > > > > In that case I have to step back beca

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.11.0 Release

I will take the release Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 12:37 AM Nicolò Boschi wrote: > I understand the need for the Pulsar Summit. > > In that case I have to step back because I will be offline for the next few > weeks > Sorry > > Nicolò Boschi > > Il Gio 21 Lug 2022, 06:32

[DISCUSS] PIP 193 : Sink preprocessing Function

Dear Pulsar dev community, I would like to open a discussion here about PIP 193 : Sink preprocessing Function . Best regards Christophe ## Motivation Pulsar IO connectors make it possible to connect Pulsar to an external system: * A Source reads c

Re: PIP-187 Add API to analyse a subscription backlog and provide a accurate value

Il giorno ven 22 lug 2022 alle ore 11:16 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > > As you can't know when you will need this value, you are going to > waste resources in order to calculate > something that you won't use. > > > This API to analyze a subscription is not meant to be used often, but > only to debu

Re: PIP-187 Add API to analyse a subscription backlog and provide a accurate value

> As you can't know when you will need this value, you are going to waste resources in order to calculate something that you won't use. > This API to analyze a subscription is not meant to be used often, but only to debug (manually) problems. Oh, I got your point. One concern is if we are using