GitHub user lhotari added a comment to the discussion: What's the best practice
to build java-test-image?
There seems to be some network issues. In the output, you can see:
> [INFO] Err:6 http://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt Mirrorlist
> [INFO] Could not connect to mirrors.ubuntu.com:80 (19
GitHub user tisonkun created a discussion: How to build java-test-image on
Apple M1?
cc @lhotari
Today I'm trying to build java-test-image on Apple M1. Run
`build/build_java_test_image.sh` and get:
```
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal com.spotify:dockerfile-maven-plugin:1.4.13:build
(default
mattisonchao opened a new pull request, #277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/277
### Motivation
Bump Apache Pulsar version to 2.9.3
### Modifications
- Bump Apache Pulsar version to 2.9.3
### Verifying this change
- [x] Make sure that
In addition to #16202, there is a following PR to support the correct
ACK implementation for chunked messages. It should depend on #16202
But I think I can submit an initial PR this week and change the tests
after #16202 is merged.
Thanks,
Yunze
> 2022年7月18日 11:22，PengHui Li 写道：
>
> Hi all,
GitHub user tisonkun added a comment to the discussion: What's the best
practice to build java-test-image?
Each time it failed in different step but all about cannot download from a
remote place. Perhaps it's about network issues.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/166
Hi all,
We released 2.10.0 three months ago. And there are many great changes in
the master branch,
including new features and performance improvements.
- PIP 74: apply client memory to consumer
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15216
- PIP 143: Support split bundles by specified boundaries
h
+1
Penghui
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:15 AM Zike Yang wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 3:58 PM Dave Maughan
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pulsar Community
> >
> > I would like to start a VOTE on "PIP-184: Topic specific consumer
> > priorityLevel".
> >
> > The proposal can be read at
Hi Enrico
> it is always a good idea to not create a batch message
I agree this. So maybe I need a little work to fix the internal tests.:)
Thanks
Xiaoyu Hou
Enrico Olivelli 于2022年7月15日周五 17:29写道：
> Thanks for driving this initiative.
>
> I think that it is better to not add a configuration fl
+1
Thanks
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 3:58 PM Dave Maughan
wrote:
>
> Hi Pulsar Community
>
> I would like to start a VOTE on "PIP-184: Topic specific consumer
> priorityLevel".
>
> The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16481
>
> and the discussion thread is available
Hi Haiting,
> For this point, like I wrote in the reply to Asaf, I still think the cost
of
maintaining the consumers would be a little too high, especially the
lifecycle
management part. It's quite complicated in replicator already.
Yes, I see it. Makes sense. Without the replicator, it looks lik
Hi Penghui,
> I had a conversation with Asaf, looks like we can use the RawReader for a
> shadow topic internally to consume
> messages from the original topic. So that we don't need to introduce
> `shadow_message_id`, and don't need to introduce
> changes to the replicator.
For this point, like
Hi Asafa,
On 2022/07/13 08:15:59 Asaf Mesika wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed answer. I have a few follow-up questions:
>
> 1. Can you clarify how data is flowing exactly. Specifically, from source
> topic broker to shadow topic broker? I tried to follow the PIP again to
> understand that, especi
12 matches
Mail list logo
