+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Xiaoyu Hou
Qiang Huang 于2022年7月8日周五 14:32写道：
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> I would like to start a VOTE on "Provide new load balance placement
> strategy implementation for ModularLoadManagerStrategy" (PIP-182).
> The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsa
+1
Thanks,
Haiting
On 2022/07/08 06:30:19 Qiang Huang wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> I would like to start a VOTE on "Provide new load balance placement
> strategy implementation for ModularLoadManagerStrategy" (PIP-182).
> The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/1
urfreespace merged PR #143:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/143
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pulsar.a
Good job! +1
Baodi Shi 于2022年7月7日周四 22:16写道：
> Hi, that looks good.
>
> There are also some REST calls that can be reduced.
>
> As: When unloadNamespace, if a bund on this broker, can be directly
> unloaded.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Baodi Shi
>
> > On Jul 7, 2022, at 15:3330, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> >
Hi Pulsar Community,
I would like to start a VOTE on "Provide new load balance placement
strategy implementation for ModularLoadManagerStrategy" (PIP-182).
The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16274 .
The PR link is https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16281
and the
tisonkun opened a new pull request, #54:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/54
Contributors' comments often contains whitespaces and such whitespaces
should not affect command validation.
See also
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/runs/7245841750?check_suite_focus=t
BewareMyPower commented on PR #219:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/219#issuecomment-1178474829
Yeah. And I'll confirm the version from the user
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t
k2la commented on PR #219:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/219#issuecomment-1178472617
@BewareMyPower
This fix does not address the root cause.
Could you additionally write comments indicating that this modification is
workaround?
Also, what versions of
urfreespace merged PR #142:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/142
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pulsar.a
urfreespace commented on PR #142:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/142#issuecomment-1178448819
> @urfreespace could you please review this PR from the technical
perspective? Thank you!
LGTM
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to th
Anonymitaet commented on PR #142:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/142#issuecomment-1178448239
@urfreespace
could you please review this PR from the technical perspective? Thank you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
Hi Everyone!
While working on some dependency improvements to pulsar-client-go, I
noticed that the oauth2 sub-directory is defined as a go sub-module instead
of just a normal sub-directory. This just means it has its own go.mod and
go.sum, and it's dependencies are separately managed from the mai
gurleen-gks commented on code in PR #258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/258#discussion_r916153811
##
src/README.md:
##
@@ -45,6 +45,28 @@ spring.datasource.password=postgres
./gradlew -x build -x test
```
+### Enable Https forward
+
+First, please obtain
gurleen-gks commented on issue #310:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/310#issuecomment-1178020052
@sijie Is this fixed?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
The PIP passes with 3 bindings +1: Hang Chen, Penghui Li, and Enrico
Olivelli. I will start working, Please help to move to the wiki. Thanks
Yubiao Feng
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 10:10 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Penghui
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 12:40 AM Yubiao Feng
> wrote:
>
> >
Hi Dave
> Is there any intention in the future to change this to the default
behaviour, in 3.0.0?
There are no plans for that right now
> Is that the motivation to feature flag this change, rather than treat it
as a bugfix?
Yes, the design goal now is that rejection of unknown request parameter
Great! I will give it a review in this weekend and see whether I can give a
review before or after merge :)
Best,
tison.
Nicolò Boschi 于2022年7月7日周四 22:46写道：
> The PIP passes with 4 bindings and 6 non-bindings +1.
>
> Please note the first pull is already ready for review:
> https://github.com/
Hi Michael Marshall
> I think we should go further and add this configuration option to the
function worker and possibly the proxy.
- Proxy: If the broker rejects a request with unknown parameters, the proxy
will behave the same as the broker, so the proxy does not need to do
additional support.
Hi Haiting
> Can we get a warning log on broker, even if this is false. This would be
useful for existing clusters to turn on this feature.
I think it is a good idea. It may not be easy to implement, but I will try
it. I will explain in PR whether this is implemented and why.
Thanks
Yubiao Feng
The PIP passes with 4 bindings and 6 non-bindings +1.
Please note the first pull is already ready for review:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16251
Thanks everyone,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mer 6 lug 2022 alle ore 04:48 Michael Marshall <
mmarsh...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> +1 (non-bindin
Hi, that looks good.
There are also some REST calls that can be reduced.
As: When unloadNamespace, if a bund on this broker, can be directly unloaded.
Thanks,
Baodi Shi
> On Jul 7, 2022, at 15:3330, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Xiaoyu Hou,
> I support this PIP
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno gio 7
Congrats!
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno gio 7 lug 2022 alle ore 13:28 Haiting Jiang <
jianghait...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> Congratulates, Zixuan!
>
> BR,
> Haiting
>
> On 2022/07/07 10:03:36 Yu wrote:
> > Hi team,
> >
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Pulsar has invited
> > Zixu
SignorMercurio opened a new pull request, #142:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/142
Something's different between local `yarn start` site and published site and
I haven't figured out why. Hopefully this temporary fix will resolve the style
error in tab highlighting.
--
Th
Hi Enrico,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 2022/07/05 08:03:43 Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> I have a couple of additional questions.
>
> 1. Security
> What about security permissions about the shadow topic ?
> We are reading from another topic.
> I think we must clarify the decisions in the PIP
As sha
Congratulates, Zixuan!
BR,
Haiting
On 2022/07/07 10:03:36 Yu wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Pulsar has invited
> Zixuan Liu (https://github.com/nodece) to become a committer
> and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.
>
> Being a committer ena
Hi Yubiao,
+1
Is there any intention in the future to change this to the default
behaviour, in 3.0.0? I assume there are going to be some other areas of the
code base and integrations that would need to deal with the new failure
mode. So it does make sense to phase this in gradually. Is that the
Hi team,
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Pulsar has invited
Zixuan Liu (https://github.com/nodece) to become a committer
and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.
Being a committer enables easier contribution to the
project since there is no need to go via the patch
s
Hi team,
Sorry for the inconvenience. We're optimizing the Doc Bot, it does not
function well sometimes.
A quick workaround is to re-trigger the Doc Bot (eg. untick the doc label
check box and tick it again in the PR description), then it will work
normally.
Hi Nicolo,
Please do not push your chan
Xiaoyu Hou,
I support this PIP
Enrico
Il giorno gio 7 lug 2022 alle ore 05:37 Michael Marshall
ha scritto:
>
> Hi Xiaoyu Hou,
>
> Thank you for your proposal. I agree that this proposal could help
> reduce unnecessary overhead by calling the internal broker's methods
> directly instead of initia
29 matches
Mail list logo
