michaeljmarshall commented on PR #138:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/138#issuecomment-1175837630
Note that in the above comment, the replace script tries to create this
link:
https://pulsar.apache.org/api/client/2.1.0-incubating/org/apache/pulsar/client/api/ConsumerConfigu
michaeljmarshall commented on PR #138:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/138#issuecomment-1175833645
Oops, I included a couple of extra commits in there, I'll overwrite that in
just a minute by pushing with force.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
michaeljmarshall opened a new pull request, #138:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/138
The current replace.js script leads to malformed output because it converts
proper links like
`http://pulsar.apache.org/api/client/org/apache/pulsar/client/api/ConsumerConfiguration.html#se
michaeljmarshall commented on PR #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/133#issuecomment-1175786907
Note: no docs reference
`pulsar.apache.org/api/admin/org/apache/pulsar/client/admin/internal/`, but
plenty reference `pulsar.apache.org/api/admin/org/apache/pulsar/client/admin
michaeljmarshall commented on PR #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/133#issuecomment-1175784198
I just discovered that the Pulsar Admin API Javadocs changed their
generation mechanism starting with 2.8.0 because of this change:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/9246.
michaeljmarshall commented on PR #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/133#issuecomment-1175745654
I updated the PR to remove the `pulsar-broker` doc generation. I started a
discussion on the dev@ mailing list to propose removing these docs from the
website permanently.
--
Thanks for the feedback, and thank you for sharing those docs Yu.
I will probably move forward on this task next week. First, I plan to
fix the doc generation in the pulsar-site repo.
Thanks,
Michael
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 4:19 AM Yu wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
> Thanks for your awesome idea!
> You
Hi Pulsar Community,
We currently host the generated Pulsar Broker Javadocs on our website.
You can find them here [0].
I cannot find any references to these docs in the actual pulsar
documentation, which indicates to me that these are not used.
(Searching for `api/pulsar-broker` returns nothing.
SignorMercurio commented on PR #137:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/137#issuecomment-1175740427
@Anonymitaet PTAL
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
SignorMercurio opened a new pull request, #137:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/137
Fix apache/pulsar#16174.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
michaeljmarshall commented on PR #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/133#issuecomment-1175722892
> I see you've generated API docs for major and minor versions, so for
future releases, we need to generate API docs for each version (align with the
Pulsar release), correct?
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Michael
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 1:28 AM Hang Chen wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Hang
>
> Haiting Jiang 于2022年7月5日周二 14:26写道：
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Haiting
> >
> > On 2022/07/04 14:45:28 Nicolò Boschi wrote:
> > > Dear Community,
> > >
> > >
Hi Patrick,
Pulsar is a trademark of the ASF.. It is not registered. Please use the ™ as
appropriate.
All The Best,
Dave
> On Jul 4, 2022, at 10:24 AM, Patrick McFadin wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was working with my publisher on an upcoming book project I'm working on
> and found something I co
Thank you for the rc!
+1 (non-binding)
* verify sha512 checksums
* verify gpg signatures
* build pulsar and pulsar-all docker images
(massimilianomirelli/pulsar{-all}:2.9.3-rc-1)
* execute Fallout distributed system tests on multi-node k8s environment:
* Pulsar functions, data-generator-source
>> There are bad files, pom.xml.versionsBackup, inside the source tarball
>>
>> I believe that this is a problem
>> How did you build the release candidate ?
>>
>> the source tarball should not contain temporary Maven files
>> Is this problem present in other Pulsar releases ?
Yes, It’s a proble
-1 (binding)
I left other comments on the discussion.
I believe that this feature is very powerful and I generally support it.
But we must clarify how it integrates with many other Pulsar features
Thanks for driving this improvement
Enrico
Il giorno mar 5 lug 2022 alle ore 08:29 Haiting Jiang
ha
I have a couple of additional questions.
1. Security
What about security permissions about the shadow topic ?
We are reading from another topic.
I think we must clarify the decisions in the PIP
2. Truncation and deletion
What happens when you truncate or delete the source topic ?
please add a par
nkurihar merged PR #224:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/224
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@puls
nkurihar closed pull request #81: Support seting topic schema when creating
producers/consumers
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/81
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
nkurihar commented on PR #81:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/81#issuecomment-1174693067
This change is merged as a new PR with fixing some compliation errors:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/223
@lcartercondon Thank you for your contributi
20 matches
Mail list logo
