rdhabalia commented on code in PR #269:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/269#discussion_r907003823
##
charts/pulsar/templates/zookeeper-statefulset.yaml:
##
@@ -134,10 +134,19 @@ spec:
containerPort: {{ .Values.zookeeper.ports.clientTls }}
I forgot to close this vote.
I'm closing the vote.
The proposal has been accepted with 4 binding +1, non-binding +1 votes.
Thanks,
Cong Zhao
On 2022/05/26 13:40:30 zhaocong wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
>
> I would like to start a VOTE on "Support zero-copy of NIC to NIC on Proxy"
> (PIP-168
Thanks for your participation.
I'm closing the vote.
The proposal has been accepted with 5 binding +1, non-binding +2 votes.
On 2022/06/17 01:21:14 Cong Zhao wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
>
> I would like to start a VOTE on "Add the classLoader field for
> SchemaDefinition" (PIP-177).
>
>
>
nodece commented on code in PR #243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/243#discussion_r906987312
##
scripts/pulsar/common_auth.sh:
##
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ fi
OUTPUT=${CHART_HOME}/output
OUTPUT_BIN=${OUTPUT}/bin
-PULSARCTL_VERSION=v0.4.0
+PULSARCTL_VERSION=v2
nodece commented on code in PR #243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/243#discussion_r906987312
##
scripts/pulsar/common_auth.sh:
##
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ fi
OUTPUT=${CHART_HOME}/output
OUTPUT_BIN=${OUTPUT}/bin
-PULSARCTL_VERSION=v0.4.0
+PULSARCTL_VERSION=v2
+1
Zike Yang
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:26 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> +1
>
> Penghui
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 10:53 AM Yubiao Feng
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Pulsar community:
> >
> > I open a pip to discuss "Support the admin API to check unknown request
> > parameters"
> >
> > Proposal Link: https://
Hi -
The Release Manager can vote. Shouldn’t you?
Best Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 26, 2022, at 5:51 PM, PengHui Li wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for all your verification for 2.10.1
>
> We currently have 2 (+1) bindings and 5 (+1) non-bindings.
> We need one more (+1) bindi
massakam commented on code in PR #81:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/81#discussion_r906929063
##
src/SchemaInfo.h:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the
massakam commented on code in PR #81:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/81#discussion_r906928816
##
src/SchemaInfo.cc:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See th
massakam commented on code in PR #81:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/81#discussion_r906929144
##
src/SchemaInfo.h:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the
massakam commented on PR #81:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/81#issuecomment-1166771346
I've resolved the conflict, but the current code fails to compile.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHu
massakam commented on code in PR #81:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/81#discussion_r906928647
##
src/SchemaInfo.cc:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See th
+1 for enabling the GitHub Discussion as I proposed before.
At that time, the main concern was not able to sync info between GitHub
Discussion and Mailing List. Since the concern can be resolved now, we can
make the most of GitHub Discussion as it's a powerful supplementary to
community collaborat
Hi Mattison,
Thanks for your great work!
I found one problem with this candidate.
- When I import `pulsar-broker` and `managed-ledger` into my
project, I found the project build failed with the following
exceptions.
```
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project test_pulsar_lib: Could not
Hi Penghui,
Thanks for your great work!
I found two problems with this candidate, I'm not sure whether it will
block this release.
- There are some CVEs in this candidate. Please refer to:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/runs/6854904384?check_suite_focus=true
- When I import `pul
+1 (binding)
- verify gpg signatures
- run standalone
- pub/sub with pulsar-perf
- verify connector (Cassandra)
- verify stateful function
- build image and test internally for the integration tests (all the tests
get passed)
@mattison It's better to upload the image under your org first so that
Hi all,
Thanks for all your verification for 2.10.1
We currently have 2 (+1) bindings and 5 (+1) non-bindings.
We need one more (+1) binding to unblock the 2.10.1 release.
Please help validate.
Thanks,
Penghui
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 12:43 PM Shusuke Tsuda
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - veri
nodece commented on code in PR #243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/243#discussion_r906836366
##
scripts/pulsar/common_auth.sh:
##
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ fi
OUTPUT=${CHART_HOME}/output
OUTPUT_BIN=${OUTPUT}/bin
-PULSARCTL_VERSION=v0.4.0
+PULSARCTL_VERSION=v2
18 matches
Mail list logo
