[GitHub] [pulsar-client-node] massakam merged pull request #202: Update pulsar node client version to 1.7.0-rc.0

2022-03-10 Thread GitBox
massakam merged pull request #202: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/202 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.8.1 Candidate 1

2022-03-10 Thread Hiroyuki Sakai
+1(binding) - Verify the checksum / signature - Run producer and consumer Regards, Hiroyuki From: r...@apache.org Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 16:39 To: dev@pulsar.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.8.1 Candidate 1 Hi everyone, Please rev

[GitHub] [pulsar-client-node] tuteng commented on pull request #202: Update pulsar node client version to 1.7.0-rc.0

2022-03-10 Thread GitBox
tuteng commented on pull request #202: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/202#issuecomment-1064804384 Thanks, fixed @massakam -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go t

Re: [VOTE] [PIP-143] Support split bundle by specified boundaries

2022-03-10 Thread Aloys Zhang
Thanks for your vote. Close this vote with 3 (+1) bindings and 4 (+1) non-bindings, 0 (-1). Zixuan Liu 于2022年3月11日周五 11:03写道: > +1 > > Hang Chen 于2022年3月10日周四 23:19写道: > > > +1 > > > > Best, > > Hang > > > > Lin Lin 于2022年3月9日周三 11:09写道: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Lin Lin > > >

[GitHub] [pulsar-client-node] massakam opened a new pull request #203: Update compatibility table in README

2022-03-10 Thread GitBox
massakam opened a new pull request #203: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/203 Updated the compatibility table in README.md as version 1.6.2 has been released. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to Gi

[GitHub] [pulsar-client-node] massakam commented on pull request #202: Update pulsar node client version to 1.7.0-rc.0

2022-03-10 Thread GitBox
massakam commented on pull request #202: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/202#issuecomment-1064760989 This also needs to be updated. https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/blob/8ebe33bd20d5ad951179e5fc69137a1ddc2cc5b2/package-lock.json#L9 -- This is an aut

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar Node.js client 1.6.2 released

2022-03-10 Thread Guangning E
The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce Apache Pulsar Node.js client version 1.6.2. Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on commodity hardware. It provides simple pub-sub semantics over topics, guaranteed at-least-once delivery of messages, automatic cursor manag

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Node.js Client Release 1.6.2 Candidate 1

2022-03-10 Thread Guangning E
Thanks to everyone for the validation Close this vote: 3 +1(binding) Masahiro Sakamoto Nozomi Kurihara Hiroyuki Sakai 1 +1(non-binding) Guangning E Thanks, Guangning Guangning E 于2022年3月10日周四 21:36写道: > Sorry, it seems I made a mistake, I mistakenly thought the package on > npmjs would mak

Re: [VOTE] [PIP-143] Support split bundle by specified boundaries

2022-03-10 Thread Zixuan Liu
+1 Hang Chen 于2022年3月10日周四 23:19写道: > +1 > > Best, > Hang > > Lin Lin 于2022年3月9日周三 11:09写道: > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Lin Lin >

Re: [VOTE] [PIP-144] Making SchemaRegistry implementation configurable

2022-03-10 Thread Aparajita Singh
*bump* On Wed, 9 Mar 2022, 18:30 PengHui Li, wrote: > +1 > > Penghui > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:27 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Enrico > > > > Il giorno mer 9 mar 2022 alle ore 06:39 Aparajita Singh > > ha scritto: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to start

[GitHub] [pulsar-site] Paul-TT opened a new pull request #18: Nav updates and removing duplicative relase notes page

2022-03-10 Thread GitBox
Paul-TT opened a new pull request #18: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/18 I removed my duplicative Release Notes page and reversed the changes I made to the release note markdown files. I have included additional changes to the navigation styling. -- This is an

[GitHub] [pulsar-site] Paul-TT closed pull request #17: release notes layout and nav updates

2022-03-10 Thread GitBox
Paul-TT closed pull request #17: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/17 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..

Re: [VOTE] PIP-145: Improve performance of regex subscriptions

2022-03-10 Thread Michael Marshall
+1 - thanks for the discussion on the other thread. > (seeing a mention about those problems in the PIP text would be great) I agree with Enrico that it'd be nice to see the outcome of the discussion reflected in the PIP text. Thanks, Michael On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 8:51 AM Hang Chen wrote: >

[GitHub] [pulsar-site] Paul-TT opened a new pull request #17: release notes layout and nav updates

2022-03-10 Thread GitBox
Paul-TT opened a new pull request #17: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/17 - Created a release notes page with a 3 column layout, as discussed in meeting on Monday, March 7th. - Updated all.md and timeline.md to include inline TOC and wrapped content in a div. This w

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-145: Improve performance of regex subscriptions

2022-03-10 Thread Michael Marshall
Makes sense. I did not fully appreciate the importance of the "filtered" boolean on the CommandGetTopicsOfNamespaceResponse message. I agree that it could be valuable to detect "simple" regexes and apply those filters server side. That could also be an optimization to add later, if it proves to be

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-145: Improve performance of regex subscriptions

2022-03-10 Thread Matteo Merli
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:26 PM Michael Marshall wrote: > > I believe we can address the risk by providing a switch to enable/disable > > this feature. > > Would it be worth putting server side filtering behind a flag in the > FeatureFlags protobuf message so that clients can still benefit from

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-145: Improve performance of regex subscriptions

2022-03-10 Thread Michael Marshall
Thank you for your responses, Matteo and Andras. This PIP is a good improvement on the current design for regex consumers. I agree that there isn't an easy way to distribute new topic notifications via a topic, at this time. > This proposal doesn't really change the existing behavior of how that >

[DISCUSS] Updating our Pulsar Release Plan

2022-03-10 Thread Michael Marshall
Hi Pulsar Community, I would like to start a discussion about updating our release plan. Our current plan is PIP 47, which was adopted in 2019. Since then, we have followed some, but not all, of the plan's guidance. I think it would be helpful to revisit the plan to make sure that it is represent

Re: [VOTE] [PIP-143] Support split bundle by specified boundaries

2022-03-10 Thread Hang Chen
+1 Best, Hang Lin Lin 于2022年3月9日周三 11:09写道: > > +1 > > Thanks, > Lin Lin

Re: [VOTE] PIP-145: Improve performance of regex subscriptions

2022-03-10 Thread Hang Chen
+1. I agree with Enrico. We'd better address the comments pointed out my Micheal, especially for protection against malicious RegExps. Thanks, Hang Enrico Olivelli 于2022年3月10日周四 16:36写道: > > I have re-read the discussion thread a couple of times. > This solution works for me. > > I am sure that

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Node.js Client Release 1.6.2 Candidate 1

2022-03-10 Thread Guangning E
Sorry, it seems I made a mistake, I mistakenly thought the package on npmjs would make it easier for users to verify it, now I have released 1.6.2 to npmjs, I will announce the result of this release tomorrow after I upload the package to apache. Thanks, Guangning aaa 于2022年3月9日周三 11:07写道: > Hi

[GitHub] [pulsar-helm-chart] kwenZh opened a new pull request #242: Fix issue that bookkeeper don't support some jvm options anymore on java11

2022-03-10 Thread GitBox
kwenZh opened a new pull request #242: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/242 ### Motivation in pulsar 2.8.x, there are a few JVM options that the bookkeeper doesn't support anymore. It should be removed from the vaules.yaml as the default configuration. sugg

Re: [VOTE] PIP-145: Improve performance of regex subscriptions

2022-03-10 Thread Enrico Olivelli
I have re-read the discussion thread a couple of times. This solution works for me. I am sure that we will address during the implementation some details (pointed out my Micheal Marshall) like: - max number of observers - protection about malicious RegExps (seeing a mention about those problems i

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-145: Improve performance of regex subscriptions

2022-03-10 Thread Matteo Merli
-- Matteo Merli On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 9:36 PM Michael Marshall wrote: > > My primary concern is that our event driven messaging platform relies > on polling for distribution of system events, like newly created > topics. I would love to find a purely event driven solution. As discussed above,

Re: [VOTE][PIP-146] ManagedCursorInfo compression

2022-03-10 Thread Haiting Jiang
+1 Thanks, Haiting On 2022/03/09 09:18:04 Zixuan Liu wrote: > Hi Pulsar community, > > I want to start this PIP - https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/14529 > > Thanks, > Zixuan >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-145: Improve performance of regex subscriptions

2022-03-10 Thread Matteo Merli
+1 -- Matteo Merli On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 4:41 PM PengHui Li wrote: > > +1 > > Penghui > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:11 PM Andras Beni > wrote: > > > Hi Pulsar Community, > > > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Improve performance of regex > > subscriptions" (PIP-145). > > > > The proposal can

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.8.1 Candidate 1

2022-03-10 Thread Matteo Merli
+1 Verified the checksums and tried the Go perf-producer/consumers. Thanks, Matteo -- Matteo Merli On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 11:39 PM wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.8.1, as > follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not