The patch is merged.
Thank you Andrey, removing dead code is a good thing, as it allows the
community to not waste energy.
Enrico
Il Ven 4 Feb 2022, 06:04 Devin Bost ha scritto:
> I support this change. Having different connectors in each project is
> actually really confusing for new folks
I support this change. Having different connectors in each project is
actually really confusing for new folks since it's not automatically clear
which adapter they should be using.
--
Devin G. Bost
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022, 1:17 PM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I created a PR to remove Flink fr
michaeljmarshall merged pull request #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-adapters/pull/34
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: d
frankjkelly commented on pull request #224:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/224#issuecomment-1029360884
@ckdarby good point `1.25` will be coming at some point later this year
`1.24` looks due in April
https://github.com/kubernetes/sig-release/tree/master/releases/re
ckdarby commented on pull request #224:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/224#issuecomment-1029349997
Just an FYI, from [the
docs](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/policy/pod-security-policy/):
> PodSecurityPolicy is deprecated as of Kubernetes v1.21, and will be
dlg99 commented on pull request #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-adapters/pull/34#issuecomment-1029332355
@merlimat I updated readme
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
dlg99 commented on a change in pull request #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-adapters/pull/34#discussion_r798905138
##
File path:
examples/kafka-streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/kafkastreams/pulsar/example/PageViewTypedDemo.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
+/**
+ * Li
michaeljmarshall commented on a change in pull request #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-adapters/pull/34#discussion_r798896872
##
File path:
examples/kafka-streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/kafkastreams/pulsar/example/PageViewTypedDemo.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
dlg99 commented on a change in pull request #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-adapters/pull/34#discussion_r798893867
##
File path:
examples/kafka-streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/kafkastreams/pulsar/example/PageViewTypedDemo.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
+/**
+ * Li
merlimat commented on pull request #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-adapters/pull/34#issuecomment-1029318181
We could also update the README to mention the adapters that are now
developed somewhere else
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
michaeljmarshall commented on a change in pull request #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-adapters/pull/34#discussion_r798892369
##
File path:
examples/kafka-streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/kafkastreams/pulsar/example/PageViewTypedDemo.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
Hello,
I created a PR to remove Flink from the Pulsar adapters project:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-adapters/pull/34
Motivation is:
* It is based on an old version of Flink (1.7.2, current is 1.14.3) which
brings in dependencies with various CVEs. 1.7 is not maintained anymore.
* Flink added
dlg99 opened a new pull request #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-adapters/pull/34
### Motivation
Removing Flink in favor of
https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/master/flink-connectors/flink-connector-pulsar
This one is based on an old version of Flink which bring in dep
I added the links to GitHub issues to the spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/165FHpHjs5fHccSsmQM4beeg6brn-zfUjcrXf6xAu4yQ/edit#gid=456314619
Let's focus fixing the top 10 most flaky tests asap. Please comment on the
issue that you are working on it so that we don't unnecessarily do
>On my first reading, it wasn't clear if there was only one topic
required for this feature. I now see that the topic is not tied to a
specific tenant or namespace. As such, we can avoid complicated
authorization questions by putting the required event topic(s) into a
"system" tenant and namespace
Hi folks,
Just want to make you notice that currently the master branch has two
blocker issues:
1. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/14104
2. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/13891
Also the 2.9 branch has one blocker issue - a regression introduced with
Pulsar 2.9.0. I believe it is be
Dear Pulsar community members,
Here's a report of the flaky tests in Pulsar CI during the observation
period of 2022-01-27 to 2022-02-03 .
The full report is available as a Google Sheet,
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/165FHpHjs5fHccSsmQM4beeg6brn-zfUjcrXf6xAu4yQ
There are a lot more flaky
Hi Ran, thanks for driving the release.
I haven't tested the rc yet but I firmly believe we should include this
pull [1] which fixes a regression introduced in Pulsar 2.9.0
[1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14097
Il giorno mer 2 feb 2022 alle ore 08:34 Enrico Olivelli
ha scritto:
> (
blankensteiner commented on issue #92:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/92#issuecomment-1028829037
You are most welcome .:-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
VisualBean edited a comment on issue #92:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/92#issuecomment-1028828300
Awesome, I will most likely contribute an OAuth factory within a couple of
days then!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to t
VisualBean closed issue #92:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/92
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
VisualBean commented on issue #92:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/92#issuecomment-1028828300
Awesome, I will most likely contribute within a couple of days then!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
blankensteiner commented on issue #92:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/92#issuecomment-1028824684
Yeah, go nuts, you just need to implement IAuthentication :-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
VisualBean commented on issue #92:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/92#issuecomment-1028808586
Looks good. From my quick glance, it looks like we can simply implement a
different authfactory for oauth/whatever we want?
I see another issue has been created for OAuth
goldenccargill commented on pull request #95:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/pull/95#issuecomment-1028759637
Fair enough, hadn't considered using the token for the previous tests.
Agree merging Stress and Integration would be good.
I think over time it might be har
blankensteiner commented on pull request #95:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/pull/95#issuecomment-1028730259
We might need multiple instances in the future, but the old tests could just
have a token added and then we only have to maintain one yml-file and only have
to spin
goldenccargill commented on pull request #95:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/pull/95#issuecomment-1028719172
Ok, I wanted separate instances as I wanted one instance that used token
auth for the new stuff and one that didn't for all the current tests.
As long as the
blankensteiner commented on pull request #95:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/pull/95#issuecomment-1028705632
Hi @goldenccargill
I couldn't run the tests, so I made some changes to the tests and also
ensured that only one standalone instance is used for all the tests in
28 matches
Mail list logo
