Re: [PIP-78] Reduce redundant producers from partitioned producer

Do you have any comments? If there are no comments by Dec. 7, I will close the discussion and rebase the PR commit to current master. Regards, -- Yuri Mizushima yumiz...@yahoo-corp.jp On 2021/11/16 15:46, "Yuri Mizushima" wrote: Dear Pulsar community, I have created a new PR htt

[Vote] PIP 104: Add new consumer type: TableView

Hi Pulsar Community, I would like to start a VOTE on the Pulsar TableView consumer (PIP 104). The issue for PIP 104 is here: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12356 And the prototype implementation is here: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12838

Re: [DISCUSS] Pulsar Protocol For Client Timeouts and Creating Producers

Following up here, I am still in need of reviews for PR [0]. It introduces an important clarification to the Pulsar Protocol Spec. Please take a look, if you are able. [0] - https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12948 Thanks! Michael On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 1:10 PM Michael Marshall wrote: > > I

Re: [DISCUSS] Mitigate possibility of out of order messages

Following up on this, the PR to fix the Java Client [0] is still open and needs reviews. Please take a look, if you're able. [0] - https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12779 Thanks! Michael On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 5:35 PM Michael Marshall wrote: > > Hi Pulsar Community, > > I discovered a race