Re: Cutting releases for 2.7 and 2.6 branches

No better place than the download page to communicate the lifecycle. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 4, 2021, at 9:19 PM, Michael Marshall wrote: > > Hi Enrico, > > Thank you for starting this conversation. I have been meaning to > follow up on this topic for some time, so I already have some th

Re: Cutting releases for 2.7 and 2.6 branches

Hi Enrico, Thank you for starting this conversation. I have been meaning to follow up on this topic for some time, so I already have some thoughts to share. Based on my interpretation of PIP-47 [0], we committed to support each minor release for a year after its initial release. We created tag "v

Re: [VOTE] PIP-97 Asynchronous Authentication Provider

Michael, I will take care of copying the PIP doc to the Wiki tomorrow Congrats for your first PIP Enrico Il Lun 4 Ott 2021, 16:48 Michael Marshall ha scritto: > Hello, > > We can close the VOTE now and mark PIP-97 as Approved. > > The implementation is not ready for review, so we should wait u

Re: [PIP 102] Pulsar Watermarking

Thanks for the feedback, I will address it along with feedback from the upcoming summit, and then post an updated draft. I also have details about evolving the Flink connector and Pulsar function framework to support this feature. On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 4:57 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Great w

[GitHub] [pulsar-manager] jonpowellhawkeye opened a new issue #424: Docker Image Healthchecks

jonpowellhawkeye opened a new issue #424: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/424 We deploy Pulsar Manager as a Docker container in ECS. To avoid having to use the DNS of the specific instance it's running on to access the front end (port 9527) and back end (port 7750), I'

Re: [VOTE] PIP-96 Message payload processor for Pulsar client

Done. Thanks for your reminder. Thanks, Yunze > 2021年10月4日 下午2:16，Enrico Olivelli 写道： > > Yunze > You can move the PIP to Approved and copy it to the Wiki. > > Now that it is approved we can review and finally merge the PR > > Enrico > > Il Lun 4 Ott 2021, 08:03 Yunze Xu ha scritto: > >> I

Re: Cutting 2.9.0 RC - final call

Just a reminder of review for PIP 96: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12088 And I’ve pinged reviewers again just now. Thanks, Yunze > 2021年10月4日 下午3:01，Enrico Olivelli 写道： > > > > There are a few approved PIP that needs review and mergin

Re: [VOTE] PIP-97 Asynchronous Authentication Provider

Hello, We can close the VOTE now and mark PIP-97 as Approved. The implementation is not ready for review, so we should wait until the branch for 2.9 is cut before merging any of the PRs for this PIP. We have 3 +1 (3 binding): Matteo, Enrico, Sijie Thank you for taking a look and voting. Thanks

Cutting releases for 2.7 and 2.6 branches

Hello folks, It has been quite some time since the latest releases of branch 2.6 and 2.7. We should cut a release. Probably we should also start a discussion about sending 2.6 to EOL as we are releasing 2.9.0. I am following the release for 2.9, is there any volunteer to drive a release for 2.7

Cutting 2.9.0 RC - final call

Hello everyone, I am going to cut the first RC of Pulsar 2.9.0 on Wednesday, in Europe morning. There are a few approved PIP that needs review and merging. Please let me know for any blocker. Tomorrow, Tuesday, I will move every pending issue and PR scheduled for 2.9.0 to 2.10.0. If the owner o