Re: [Proposal] Creating an Apache Pulsar Outreach Working Group

Dave, Thank you for the reply and you are correct that there should be anything stopping us from doing this informally on the dev@ list. And given the absence of any other feedback, I think that is what we should do. I am assuming that it is ok for me to start volunteering on an informal basis t

Re: Protocol Handlers in Pulsar Proxy

+1 Thanks for your proposal, Enrico. I completely agree that the Pulsar Proxy is an integral component in a Pulsar cluster running on k8s. Further, considering that the proxy interacts with clients as if it were a broker and that we already support protocol handlers in the broker, I think it is a

[Upgrade Docusuraus] Standardizing Writing Process

Hi Pulsar enthusiasts, As we discussed before, to improve the UX, we plan to upgrade the Pulsar website framework (Docusuraus) from 1.11 to the latest stable version. We’ve started upgrading Docusuraus this

[GitHub] [pulsar-helm-chart] acjohnson commented on pull request #150: added additionalCommand parameter

acjohnson commented on pull request #150: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/150#issuecomment-907207056 > @acjohnson - are you only looking to supply the a custom trust store to the JVM? If so, it is possible to configure the JVM's keystore and truststore using the follo

Protocol Handlers in Pulsar Proxy

Hello, Currently we have the ability to add Protocol Handlers to the Pulsar Broker, this is great, because you can add your code that uses internal Pulsar APIs and implement your own protocols. When you run Pulsar in k8s (and this is happening more and more) you need to run the Pulsar proxy. The P

Re: Pulsar 2.8.1 use ubuntu:20.04 base image instead of openjdk:11-jdk image

Il giorno ven 27 ago 2021 alle ore 12:15 Hang Chen ha scritto: > Hi Enrico, > Thanks for you feedback. Yes, this is an important change for minor > version release. > > For your two questions, > 1) We build docker image on CI for every PR, but openjdk:11-jdk docker > image updated a few d

Re: Pulsar 2.8.1 use ubuntu:20.04 base image instead of openjdk:11-jdk image

Hi Enrico, Thanks for you feedback. Yes, this is an important change for minor version release. For your two questions, 1) We build docker image on CI for every PR, but openjdk:11-jdk docker image updated a few days ago due to Debian 11 released, which only support python3.9, release log l

[GitHub] [pulsar-client-node] nkurihar opened a new pull request #170: Cherry pick some patches to 1.3

nkurihar opened a new pull request #170: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/170 Cherry-picked 2 patches to branch-1.3 for backport: * https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/156 * https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/166 -- This is an autom

Re: Pulsar 2.8.1 use ubuntu:20.04 base image instead of openjdk:11-jdk image

Hang, thank you for being the release manager and trying to fix the problems. This is an important change, and before adding it to a point release we should be sure that we are not going to break compatibility. I have two questions: 1) aren't we building the docker images on CI for every PR relat

Pulsar 2.8.1 use ubuntu:20.04 base image instead of openjdk:11-jdk image

Hello Apache Pulsar Community, I'm Pulsar 2.8.1 release manager. When I try to build docker images on branch-2.8, it failed with the following exception: ``` Error: The command '/bin/sh -c apt-get update && apt-get install -y netcat dnsutils less procps iputils-ping