[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] dionjansen commented on pull request #83: feat: #46 support nack delay and ack timeouts

dionjansen commented on pull request #83: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/pull/83#issuecomment-905211786 > Thanks for your PR. Currently, dotpulsar does not yet support batch sending. The code in your test isn't the correct batched way. Can we handle this scenario after the

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] blankensteiner commented on issue #45: Support - Consumer.NegativeAcknowledge

blankensteiner commented on issue #45: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/45#issuecomment-905207102 Hi @alexcherka @dionjansen has created a PR for it and @RobertIndie is reviewing it. Once they are finished I can review and merge it :-) -- This is an automated me

[GitHub] [pulsar-client-node] Anonymitaet commented on a change in pull request #169: [Build] Add windows building configurations

Anonymitaet commented on a change in pull request #169: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/169#discussion_r695336948 ## File path: README.md ## @@ -52,6 +52,17 @@ If an incompatible version of the C++ client is installed, you may fail to build ## How to

[Proposal] Creating an Apache Pulsar Outreach Working Group

Hello Apache Pulsar Community, I would like to propose that the PMC create an Outreach Working Group. Here’s why it is needed: The Apache Pulsar community currently doesn't have community-driven content channels that are unaffiliated with any vendor. We also don't have an active effort to help i

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] alexcherka commented on issue #45: Support - Consumer.NegativeAcknowledge

alexcherka commented on issue #45: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/45#issuecomment-904959129 @blankensteiner Is this something we are considering in the future? Would love to utilize this functionality, it's already in F#'s version, but just wondering if we can expec

Dynamic proxy roles

I would like to propose adding support for dynamic proxy roles. Currently, the only way to provide proxy roles is through the broker.conf file. This makes it challenging to automate cluster provisioning. Additionally, the hardcoding of the proxy roles in the broker.conf makes it difficult to revoke

Re: [PROPOSAL] Defining a clearer process for PIP proposals

Matteo, thank you for your clarification I agree that having 3 +1 from PMC members is good for a PIP I am +1 in the current form of this proposal. Enrico Il giorno gio 19 ago 2021 alle ore 21:35 Matteo Merli ha scritto: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:49 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > I agre

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] blankensteiner commented on issue #84: Recover after network disconnect

blankensteiner commented on issue #84: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/84#issuecomment-904613028 Hi @PetterIsberg I have a hard time reproducing this. I'm using Docker (and not Virtualbox) and stopping the container or just disconnecting the container from the net