nkurihar closed issue #93:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/93
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
nkurihar commented on issue #93:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/93#issuecomment-875208548
Fixed: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/162
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
Il Mar 6 Lug 2021, 21:30 Neng Lu ha scritto:
> IMHO, The old runtime should not be able to run the new functions.
This is not possible to enforce this because we cannot change old code.
>
>
> New functions require resource initialization via hooks. If the actual
> `setup()` method is not calle
IMHO, The old runtime should not be able to run the new functions.
New functions require resource initialization via hooks. If the actual
`setup()` method is not called (or only a default no-op one is called), then
the function is not properly initialized and there'll be problems if they are
e
So there are two compatibility issues we need to consider here.
1) Old runtime to run new functions.
2) New runtime to run old functions.
Making the methods with default no-op implementation will resolve 1).
Is that correct?
We can use reflection to check if the methods exist or not to solve 2),
Thanks!
+1 for this release (despite there are issues reported by Penghui and Rajan)
- checked the signatures
- checked the staged artifacts
- Sijie
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 8:42 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Sijie,
>
> Il giorno mar 6 lug 2021 alle ore 17:30 Sijie Guo ha
> scritto:
>
> > Hi En
I think the reason is for keeping the original `Function` unchanged, so that
existing implemented functions are not affected.
On 2021/07/06 03:34:49 Sijie Guo wrote:
> Thank you for starting the discussion!
>
> I have added this proposal to PIP-86:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-86
Hi Pulsarers,
With the rapid adoption of Pulsar, our community is providing many features and
enhancements for *Pulsar command-line tools* and *Pulsar configuration*, that
is great!
Previously, the docs of them are updated *manually*, which is time-consuming
and error-prone. To improve the pro
Sijie,
Il giorno mar 6 lug 2021 alle ore 17:30 Sijie Guo ha
scritto:
> Hi Enrico,
>
> Where is the release process documented?
>
> I can't find it in
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Release-process or in the
> pulsar-adapters wiki page.
>
it is here, in the pulsar-adapters repo
https://
Hi Enrico,
Where is the release process documented?
I can't find it in
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Release-process or in the
pulsar-adapters wiki page.
- Sijie
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 2:34 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Any other vote please ?
>
> We need at least one more +1 from a PM
10 matches
Mail list logo
