+1 I would like to better understand these trade offs as well.
Thanks,
Michael Marshall
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 3:09 PM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A broker with a lot of topics (10k+) consumes a considerable amount of CPU
> even while idling (no messages being processed).
>
> In profiling
Hi All,
I propose and request that we release version 2.7.2 to fix a regression
introduced in 2.7.1.
Pulsar 2.7.1 introduced cursor level metrics without including the ability
to disable them (https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/9618). I recently
discovered the metrics when I created a Pulsar 2
Thank you, Sijie, for the context.
There is a PR that at least makes adapters build with pulsar 2.8.-snapshot:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-adapters/pull/9
I'd appreciate help with getting this up to the apache standards -
checkstyle, github CI, etc.
IMO we should deal with tests/integration de
dlg99 commented on pull request #9:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-adapters/pull/9#issuecomment-810571280
@eolivelli I am detaching project.version from pulsar.version and
project.groupId from pulsar's groupId because:
- eventually we'll have to release pulsar-adapters and pulsar
Using explicit release of the message resources, opens up many
different ways to optimize the consumption path.
Pooling the direct memory when consuming with ByteBuffer schema is
just one of them, but definitely not the only one.
For example we could also later on:
* Pool instances of MessageImp
dlg99 commented on pull request #9:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-adapters/pull/9#issuecomment-810473114
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/10091 for pulsar-side fix
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
Part2 should complete most of the functionalities of this feature.
Thanks,
Sijie
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 9:50 PM Michael Marshall
wrote:
> Thanks for letting me know, Sijie.
>
> I will take a look at the PR. Do you have a sense of whether or not the PR
> was close to completion? Are there other
It was my fault when I moved the adapters from master to the separate repo.
The release process should be updated to include that repo. We need to fix
it.
Some of the projects in this adopters are deprecated. For example, the
pulsar-flink connector is deprecated. Because it was an integration with
munir131 commented on issue #134:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/134#issuecomment-810285687
I am closing this issue. I find out manual way to install deb files on arch
linux. Also found that dev cpp is missing for 2.7.1
https://archive.apache.org/dist/pulsar/puls
munir131 closed issue #134:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/134
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, p
tuteng commented on issue #148:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/148#issuecomment-810220747
It seems similar to oauth2
http://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/security-oauth2/, cpp already supports oauth2
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/tree/master/pulsar-client-cpp/lib/
munir131 commented on issue #134:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/134#issuecomment-810165684
> @munir131 Can you check this comment [#134
(comment)](https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/134#issuecomment-737630822)
?
No it is not working. In t
blankensteiner merged pull request #70:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/pull/70
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this ser
kandersen82 opened a new pull request #70:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/pull/70
Fixed issue with producing with schema to non existing topic
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL a
>> > 1. Does the consumer returns buffer of the batch message? > 2. If
returns a batch message buffer, how do we handle the flow permits? It’s
better to clarify in the proposal
It will not change the semantics of the batch-message. Batch-message gets
split into individual messages at the consumer
eolivelli commented on a change in pull request #9:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-adapters/pull/9#discussion_r603836052
##
File path: examples/flink/pom.xml
##
@@ -36,7 +37,7 @@
-
+
16 matches
Mail list logo