Il giorno ven 19 mar 2021 alle ore 20:09 Lari Hotari
ha scritto:
>
> Good suggestions.
>
> > Can we configure CI in a way that it does not trigger the PR validation if
> > the PR is in draft status?
>
> Yes, that's possible. I guess this would be the solution:
> https://github.community/t/dont-run
Good idea. Let's see if this "personal CI" solution turns out to be useful.
-Lari
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:21 PM Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Is it worth adding this to the Contributing doc page?
> https://pulsar.apache.org/en/contributing/
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:37 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
>
Good suggestions.
> Can we configure CI in a way that it does not trigger the PR validation if
> the PR is in draft status?
Yes, that's possible. I guess this would be the solution:
https://github.community/t/dont-run-actions-on-draft-pull-requests/16817/16
. Please create an GH issue about this
HI Enrico,
>
>
> One problem is that I do not know how to code "my_decode_method"
> without Schema information.
> If we had the Schema that is used for the Record then the approach of
> using Sink[] may work. In fact it works perfectly for Source.
> This is not the case, because for Sink record.get
Lari
Can we configure CI in a way that it does not trigger the PR validation if
the PR is in draft status?
Or another way would be that we do not trigger the validation at PR
creation, but only when you issue a special command
IIRC the Netty project works this way.
It will be also safer, especia
Is it worth adding this to the Contributing doc page?
https://pulsar.apache.org/en/contributing/
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:37 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Dear Pulsar community members,
>
> I'm very happy to see a lot of activity in Pulsar development. This is a
> positive thing.
> The negative impac
Congrats Enrico!
Best,
Marvin,
Aparnesh Gaurav 于2021年3月19日周五 上午6:20写道：
> Congratulations Enrico ..
>
> Best regards,
> Aparnesh
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 7:33 PM Michael Marshall
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Enrico! That's great news!
> >
> > - Michael Marshall
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021
Congratulations Enrico ..
Best regards,
Aparnesh
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 7:33 PM Michael Marshall
wrote:
> Congratulations Enrico! That's great news!
>
> - Michael Marshall
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 7:06 PM Dianjin Wang .invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > Best,
> > Dianjin Wang
Dear Pulsar community members,
I'm very happy to see a lot of activity in Pulsar development. This is a
positive thing.
The negative impact of this is that it adds more load to the GitHub Actions
based Pulsar CI.
We have been seeing long build queues and slow feedback from Pulsar CI
recently.
Sin
Il giorno ven 19 mar 2021 alle ore 08:20 Jerry Peng
ha scritto:
>
> > But it doesn't work for Sinks
> currently if you declare a Sink you will see as schema Schema.BYTES.
> If we had a Schema object that is preconfigured for decoding the
> payload probably we will be done.
>
> If you declare sink
lhotari commented on pull request #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/19#issuecomment-802619268
> It looks like the source repository has had frequent updates/releases in
the past 6 months. @lhotari, do you think we need to implement a process to
ensure that our copy
eolivelli merged pull request #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/19
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service
> But it doesn't work for Sinks
currently if you declare a Sink you will see as schema Schema.BYTES.
If we had a Schema object that is preconfigured for decoding the
payload probably we will be done.
If you declare sink as Sink there should be no schema. I am not
sure what getSchema() returns but
eolivelli commented on pull request #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/19#issuecomment-802607831
@michaeljmarshall in your opinion can we merge this patch in the current
form in order to unblock apache/pulsar#9963 ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
michaeljmarshall commented on pull request #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/pull/19#issuecomment-802607279
It looks like the source repository has had frequent updates/releases in the
past 6 months. @lhotari, do you think we need to implement a process to ensure
that o
15 matches
Mail list logo
