Pulsar Community Meeting - 3/16 & 3/18

Hi all, The Pulsar Community Meeting will continue this week. If you have anything to discuss, please add a line item to the agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/19dXkVXeU2q_nHmkG8zURjKnYlvD96TbKf5KjYyASsOE/edit# - 3/16 (Tuesday): 4 PM - 5 PM PST / 7 AM - 8 AM China Time - 3/18 (Thursday):

[GitHub] [pulsar-helm-chart] zymap opened a new pull request #109: Bump pulsar version to 2.7.1

zymap opened a new pull request #109: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/109 ### Motivation Release with pulsar 2.7.1 ### Modification - update pulsar version from 2.7.0 to 2.7.1 - add a script for updating the pulsar version -

Re: Problems with Avro upgrade from 1.9 to 1.10

I don't quite understand the compatibility issue here. Looking into AVRO-2579, it seems that only the order of fields returned will be different. We don't depend on the ordering for the compatibility checks. Can you explain more about the compatibility issue you refer to? Thanks, Sijie On Mon, M

Re: [Discuss] draft PIP for "Changes to GitHub Actions based Pulsar CI"

> The prototype has demonstrated about 60% reduction in resource consumption. It is hard to quantify. Merging them into one large workflow can result in more failures. Re-running those failures can consume resources as well. > Isn't it urgent to resolve it? I think we are in a stage that gives u

Re: [Discuss] Don't include presto/trino in the normal Pulsar distribution

Lari - We don't change any release cycles. It will be the same release cycle. That was discussed as part of PIP-62. I can update it to the PIP. - Sijie On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 2:03 AM Lari Hotari wrote: > +1 for this plan. It's good to finally make progress on PIP-62 ( > > https://github.com/a

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.1 Candidate 1

Thanks for the validation. Close this vote with 3 +1(binding), 2 +1(non-binding) I will start the subsequent release work soon. Thanks, Yong On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 09:55, Jia Zhai wrote: > +1 (binding) > > OS: MacOS 10.15.6 > > - verified packages checksum and signatures ( asc and sha all goo

[GitHub] [pulsar-manager] gaoran10 opened a new pull request #375: [Offload] Add offload threshold input

gaoran10 opened a new pull request #375: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/375 Fixes #374 ### Motivation Currently, the offload operation lacks the offload threshold. ### Modifications Add the offload threshold input for the offload operation.

Problems with Avro upgrade from 1.9 to 1.10

Hello, I am working on the upgrade of Avro from 1.9 to 1.10.1. I noticed a bad behaviour change about Schema.AVRO(Pojo.class). Basically the new Avro version creates the Schema by sorting the fields in alphabetical order and this is an incompatible schema change. More details here https://github.

Re: [Discuss] draft PIP for "Changes to GitHub Actions based Pulsar CI"

Thanks for the feedback Sijie. > We are using a lazy consensus approach. Typically if there is no objection, > please go ahead and not need to wait for approval. > If people raise concerns, please address the concerns. You and Ali have raised concerns about changing the existing GitHub Actions wo

Re: [Discuss] Don't include presto/trino in the normal Pulsar distribution

+1 for this plan. It's good to finally make progress on PIP-62 ( https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-62%3A-Move-connectors%2C-adapters-and-Pulsar-Presto-to-separate-repositories) . I see that one gap in the current PIP-62 document is the lack of relevant details. I feel that it is necessary