[GitHub] [pulsar-manager] yixing1337 opened a new pull request #369: fix ISSUE-361: Pulsar manager's swagger dose not work.

2020-12-23 Thread GitBox
yixing1337 opened a new pull request #369: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/369 Fixes #ISSUE-361 ### Motivation Pulsar manager's swagger does not work, so I try to fix this issue. ### Modifications 1. Swagger urls can't be accessed because the intercepto

[GitHub] [pulsar-manager] dockerzhang opened a new pull request #368: optimize default docker image for beginners

2020-12-23 Thread GitBox
dockerzhang opened a new pull request #368: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/368 Fixes #367 ### Motivation optimize default docker image for beginners ### Modifications 1, add default value for ` SPRING_CONFIGURATION_FILE` and `URL` environment. 2, se

[GitHub] [pulsar-manager] dockerzhang opened a new issue #367: the docker image built from the master can not work correctly.

2020-12-23 Thread GitBox
dockerzhang opened a new issue #367: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/367 the docker image built from the master can not work correctly. 1, when run with command `docker run -d --name manager -p 9527:9527 -p 7750:7750 apachepulsar/pulsar-manager:latest` dock

Re: [PROPOSAL] PIP 75: Replace protobuf code generator

2020-12-23 Thread Matteo Merli
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 11:45 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > I guess we cannot leverage it on BK as we are with Protobuf 3.x The initial focus was for Proto2, though with few changes we can also support the proto3 syntax. -- Matteo Merli

Re: [PROPOSAL] PIP 75: Replace protobuf code generator

2020-12-23 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Dave, Il Mer 23 Dic 2020, 19:58 Dave Fisher ha scritto: > > > > On Dec 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Matteo Merli > wrote: > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > these are not dependencies that are needed (or would be pulled) from > > the Pulsar build. > > > > The JMH is only used if someone wants to run a benchmar

Re: [PROPOSAL] PIP 75: Replace protobuf code generator

2020-12-23 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Dec 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Matteo Merli wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > these are not dependencies that are needed (or would be pulled) from > the Pulsar build. > > The JMH is only used if someone wants to run a benchmark on the > LightProto code. Pulsar does not depend on that. Excellent. You

Re: [PROPOSAL] PIP 75: Replace protobuf code generator

2020-12-23 Thread Matteo Merli
Hi Dave, these are not dependencies that are needed (or would be pulled) from the Pulsar build. The JMH is only used if someone wants to run a benchmark on the LightProto code. Pulsar does not depend on that. >From Pulsar build we would need: 1. At build time -> The LightProto Maven Plugin with

Re: [PROPOSAL] PIP 75: Replace protobuf code generator

2020-12-23 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi Matteo, I looked at the dependencies in Splunk LightPro and the following are not acceptable in an Apache Binary: org.openjdk.jmh jmh-core ${jmh.version} org.openjdk.jmh jmh-

Re: [PROPOSAL] PIP 74: Pulsar client memory limits

2020-12-23 Thread Matteo Merli
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:57 PM Yuto Furuta wrote: > 1. Why are producer queue size related settings deprecated/ignored? > It may be true that it is easy for users to set memory sizes than queue sizes. > However, there may be some users who have already set appropriate values. > So, I think these

[PROPOSAL] PIP 75: Replace protobuf code generator

2020-12-23 Thread Matteo Merli
## Motivation In the Pulsar wire protocol, we are using Google Protobuf in order to perform serialization/deserialization of the commands that are exchanged between clients and brokers. Because of the overhead involved with the regular Protobuf implementation, since very early on, we have been us

Pulsar Community Weekly Update] 2020-12-12 ~ 2020-12-18

2020-12-23 Thread Huanli Meng
Dear Pulsar enthusiast, This is the Pulsar community weekly update for 2020-12-12 ~ 2020-12-18, with updates on Pulsar client, broker, Functions, schema, KoP, Pulsar IO, and so on. This Pulsar community weekly update is also available at https://streamnative.io/weekly/2020/2020-12/2020-12-18-puls

[GitHub] [pulsar-manager] tuteng merged pull request #308: Add frequently asked questions document

2020-12-23 Thread GitBox
tuteng merged pull request #308: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/308 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go

[GitHub] [pulsar-manager] yixing1337 commented on issue #361: Pulsar manager's swagger dose not work.

2020-12-23 Thread GitBox
yixing1337 commented on issue #361: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/361#issuecomment-750194964 I will push a pr to fix this issue This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to th

[GitHub] [pulsar-client-node] shustsud commented on issue #22: Convert project to typescript.

2020-12-23 Thread GitBox
shustsud commented on issue #22: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/22#issuecomment-750013464 @rkaw92 Sent PR to DefinitelyTyped(pulsar-client). https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/pull/50229 If the PR was merged, I think you can set messa