Re: Rerun failure ci for pulsar-client-go

2020-11-18 Thread Yuva raj
Great +1 On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 18:59, xiaolong ran wrote: > Hello everyone: > > We are very happy to tell you that in pulsar-client-go, we added > a bot action ci to rerun the failed test. Previously, because the > contributor did not have write access to this project, once the > test failed, t

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-70: Introduce lightweight raw Message metadata

2020-11-18 Thread Matteo Merli
The goal of this proposal can be achieved automatically by using a better ser/de generator that doesn't have overhead for ignored fields. I'm preparing a revamping of the current Protobuf serialization and I'll send a proposal soon. Matteo -- Matteo Merli On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 10:25 PM Aloys

Rerun failure ci for pulsar-client-go

2020-11-18 Thread xiaolong ran
Hello everyone: We are very happy to tell you that in pulsar-client-go, we added a bot action ci to rerun the failed test. Previously, because the contributor did not have write access to this project, once the test failed, there was no good way to re-execute these failed tests. Thank you very

[GitHub] [pulsar-helm-chart] DonghunLouisLee edited a comment on issue #72: Please add support for Tiered Storage in the Helm Chart

2020-11-18 Thread GitBox
DonghunLouisLee edited a comment on issue #72: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/issues/72#issuecomment-729329156 > Nono, when you change the charts you cannot use the same chart, so I repackaged locally and applied those! Not as fancy haha Ideally these should go into the