Jenkins build is back to normal : pulsar-website-build #887

See

PIP 55 Refresh Authentication Credentials

Hi, Would PIP 55 propose how the client side plugin can implement a credential/token refresh mechanism? The use case would be the client proactively refresh the bearer token before disconnected due to expiration by the broker. I am thinking some additions to Authentication/AuthenticationDataProv

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Adopt using release labels for minor releases

Done. I have deleted the minor release milestones and replaced them with release labels for minor releases 2.4.3 and 2.5.1. If you are merging a pull request, add milestone "2.6.0" since this change is merged to master and will be released as part of 2.6.0. If the pull request is also required fo

Slack digest for #dev - 2020-01-22

2020-01-21 09:28:36 UTC - orly priev: @orly priev has joined the channel 2020-01-21 09:34:35 UTC - orly priev: hi, Im investigating the option to work with pulsar, im searching for benchmark performance results and unfortunately didn't found any, do u know where can I found it? 2020-01-

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Adopt using release labels for minor releases

FYI. I have created a "Committer Guide" ( https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Committer-Guide). Added the notes on how to add labels and milestones when merging pull requests. Thanks, Sijie On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 12:37 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > I will change the current minor release milestones

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Adopt using release labels for minor releases

I will change the current minor release milestones (2.4.3 and 2.5.1) to use release labels and remove them. - Sijie On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 12:35 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > 72 hours have passed. I am happy to announce that we are adopting using > release labels for minor releases. > > The vote has p

[RESULT] [VOTE] Adopt using release labels for minor releases

72 hours have passed. I am happy to announce that we are adopting using release labels for minor releases. The vote has passed with 6 +1 votes, 0 +0 votes and 0 -0 votes. The 6 +1 votes include 3 binding votes and 3 non-binding votes. The 3 binding votes are: - Jia Zhai - Penghui Li - Sijie Guo

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept DotPulsar as part of Apache Pulsar project

72 hours have passed. I am happy to announce that Pulsar PMC accepts DotPulsar as a sub-project. The vote has received 7 +1 votes, 0 +0 votes, 0 -1 votes. The 7 +1 votes include 4 bindings votes, 3 non-binding votes. Binding votes are: - Jia Zhai - Joe F - Penghui Li - Sijie Guo Non-binding vo

Re: [DISCUSS] Homebrew libpulsar

If that's the case, we should document the process in the release process documentation. Can you help update the wiki page? - Sijie On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 1:23 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > In general, Homebrew will only accept updates to the formula once a > particular software version is already