Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.4.2 Candidate 3

Thanks Yong Zhang, Enrico Olivelli, Penghui Li, Guangning E, Chris Bartholomew, Sijie Guo, Cong Bo, Jia Zhai help validate the Release 2.4.2 Candidate 2. The difference between `Release 2.4.2 Candidate 3` and `Release 2.4.2 Candidate 2` is only to remove `bin / pulsar-standalone.pid`, to ensure

[VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.4.2 Candidate 3

Hi everyone, This is the third release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version 2.4.2. as follows: - [ ] +1, Approve the release - [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) It fixes the following issues: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/milestone/25?closed=1

A billion thanks to you from the Pulsar community

Dear Pulsar enthusiast, As the weather turns colder and sunrise gets earlier, we want to give a warm “thank you” to you for bringing great expertise and unique perspective to improve the Pulsar community. Since 2019, the Pulsar community has enjoyed rapid growth with extensive community member

Proposal on policies management at tenant level

Hi, Here is a potential proposal (PIP) on policies management at tenant level: ## Motivation Pulsar quotas, retentions and other policies are defined on namespaces level and only enforced at topic level. It would be great to have global policies on tenant level which can be overriden if polic

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.4.2 Candidate 2

Thanks Jia Zhai work for this. Sorry, the `bin/pulsar-standalone.pid` file was not deleted, resulting in `mvn apache-rat:check` fail. I will close this vote and launch a new vote after fixing this problem. -- Thanks Xiaolong, Ran > 在 2019年11月28日，下午6:58，Jia Zhai 写道： > > -1 > > mvn apache-ra

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.4.2 Candidate 2

-1 mvn apache-rat:check for src package not passed. 😂 Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 2:46 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - signatures and checksums are good for the released tarballs. > - source package can compile > - bin

Jenkins build is back to normal : pulsar-website-build #824

See

Slack digest for #dev - 2019-11-28

2019-11-27 15:42:55 UTC - Addison Higham: <- wonder how difficult it would to adapt the presto connector to work within these lambd

Re: appveyor build

Cool. Thank you! - Sijie On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 12:44 AM Ali Ahmed wrote: > That's what I commented in the ticket. > > -Ali > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 12:35 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > > > Ali, > > > > If we are moving towards Github Action, shall we disable it? > > > > - Sijie > > > > On Thu, Nov

Re: appveyor build

That's what I commented in the ticket. -Ali On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 12:35 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > Ali, > > If we are moving towards Github Action, shall we disable it? > > - Sijie > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 12:20 AM Ali Ahmed wrote: > > > Here is the ticket in regards to this. > > > > https://i

Re: appveyor build

Ali, If we are moving towards Github Action, shall we disable it? - Sijie On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 12:20 AM Ali Ahmed wrote: > Here is the ticket in regards to this. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19286 > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:25 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > > > It seems that

Re: appveyor build

Here is the ticket in regards to this. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19286 On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:25 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > It seems that we have appveyor build in the Github pull request checks. > Does anyone know where is this from? > > Thanks, > Sijie >