Re: PIP 49: Permission levels and inheritance

>Is there any appetite for considering a "namespace admin"? I think this is where there is an issue. As Sijie aptly pointed out, this namespace "admin", as a concept, does not exist in Pulsar for resource allocation. It will upend the whole design of how resources are managed in Pulsar. While w

Re: [REVOTE] PIP-47: Time Based Release Plan

+1 (binding) - Sijie On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 10:16 AM xiaolong ran wrote: > Hello everyone: > > Please review and vote on the PIP-47 propose: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-47%3A-Time-Based-Release-Plan < > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-47:-Time-Based-Release-Plan> > >

Re: [REVOTE] PIP-47: Time Based Release Plan

+1 non-binding On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 03:16, xiaolong ran wrote: > > Hello everyone: > > Please review and vote on the PIP-47 propose: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-47%3A-Time-Based-Release-Plan > > > > About d

Re: PIP 49: Permission levels and inheritance

Is there any appetite for considering a "namespace admin"? We could really have use of this as currently we have to give more people than we would want tenant admin to ease administration, when many users basically just need permissions to create topics and grant permissions to those topics. >From

[Community Weekly Update] 2019-11-02 ~ 2019-11-08

Dear Pulsar enthusiast, This is the weekly community update for 2019-11-02 ~ 2019-11-08, with updates on the sticky consumer for key-shared subscription, producers support producing messages with different schemas, the release of BookKeeper 4.10, and more. This Pulsar weekly update is also avai

Re: PIP 49: Permission levels and inheritance

Hello everyone: I reorganize the relevant content of this PIP. PTAL again. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-49:-Permission-levels-and-inheritance In this PIP, I only fix the unreasonable permissions in the