As a new user I find this a great idea.
For the future I will be happy to see the admin API to be able to connect
to the binary endpoint and not to the http one.
Cheers
Enrico
Il giorno lun 11 feb 2019, 07:03 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently we are shipping `pulsar-client` and `pul
Hi all,
Currently we are shipping `pulsar-client` and `pulsar-client-admin`
separately. They are both
shaded packages. It is quite common to see applications using both
`pulsar-client` and
`pulsar-client-admin`. These applications will have redundant shaded
classes in both
`pulsar-client` and `pul
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 11:59 PM Matteo Merli wrote:
> Nice work Sijie on getting this in!
>
> There are still few tasks that were targeted for 2.3 and were waiting
> for BK 4.9, namely:
> * Enable configuring "sticky-reads"
> * Enable configurable allocator
> * Upgrade Netty and break from "a
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:12 AM Matteo Merli wrote:
> Agree the split will be a good idea.
>
> Anyway I think the "bigger" problem is currently with the Java unit
> tests job. This job takes ~90min and has currently the higher chances
> of failure. Most of time (and all flakyness) is in the brok
Agree the split will be a good idea.
Anyway I think the "bigger" problem is currently with the Java unit
tests job. This job takes ~90min and has currently the higher chances
of failure. Most of time (and all flakyness) is in the broker tests
module which is essentially used as a mid-way between u
Nice work Sijie on getting this in!
There are still few tasks that were targeted for 2.3 and were waiting
for BK 4.9, namely:
* Enable configuring "sticky-reads"
* Enable configurable allocator
* Upgrade Netty and break from "all" to individual deps
* Update bookie memory defaults to adjust to
Hi all,
the bookkeeper 4.9.0 patch has been merged and python state PR is ready to
merge soon.
we should be ready to cut 2.3.0 release this week. Who will be doing the
2.3.0 release? Any volunteers?
- Sijie
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 5:56 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Anyone volunteers for b
