https://github.com/apache/pulsar//2759
please include this PR.
Joe F 于2018年10月11日 周四08:16写道：
> This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version 2.2.0
>
> It adds new features and also fixes for various issues from 2.1.1
>
> * Pulsar Java Client Interceptors
> * Integration of fun
This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version 2.2.0
It adds new features and also fixes for various issues from 2.1.1
* Pulsar Java Client Interceptors
* Integration of functions and io with schema registry
* Dead Letter Topic
* Flink Source connector
* JDBC Sink Connector
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 4:03 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
> the proposal looks good to me.
>
> just out of curiosity, why PoolingPolicy only has `UnpooledHeap` and
> `PooledDirect`?
>
I think these are the 2 that make sense (from my perspective):
1. Pooling heap memory still suffers from interactions w
the proposal looks good to me.
just out of curiosity, why PoolingPolicy only has `UnpooledHeap` and
`PooledDirect`?
- Sijie
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:51 PM Matteo Merli wrote:
> (CCed d...@bookkeeper.apache.org since this proposal is referring to both
> projects and I thought it might be good
Created jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17129
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:23 AM Ivan Kelly wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 6:51 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> > +1 for making it mandatory.
> >
> > - Sijie
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 9:36 PM Matteo Merli wrote:
> >
> >> Shoul
(CCed d...@bookkeeper.apache.org since this proposal is referring to both
projects and I thought it might be good to have a single discussion thread)
Wiki page is available at:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-24%3A-Simplify-memory-settings
Pasting here for convenience:
+1 well done
- Sijie
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 11:44 AM Matteo Merli wrote:
> Please review the project report to submit:
>
>
>
>
>
> ## Description:
>
> Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on
> commodity hardware. It provides simple pub-sub semantics over
+1
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 6:51 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> +1 for making it mandatory.
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 9:36 PM Matteo Merli wrote:
>
>> Should we ask infra to make the integration tests check to be mandatory?
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 9:26 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
>>
>> > Hi al
2018-10-09 16:21:23 UTC - Joe Francis: !? lib/presto/bin/launcher
!? lib/presto/bin/launcher.properties
!? lib/presto/bin/launcher.py
2018-10-09 16:21:35 UTC - Joe Francis: these are failing RAT check in the 2.2
build.
2018-10-09 16:52:04 UTC - Sijie Guo: @Jerry Peng can yo
